Legal Ethics
Judge’s Joking Went Too Far
Posted Oct 15, 2007 9:24 AM CST
By Martha Neil
Updated: During his first four years on the bench, Baltimore County District Judge Bruce Lamdin tended to say what he thought. Some considered him a breath of fresh air, a jurist who really knew how to establish a rapport with those who appeared in front of him and make a court appearance enjoyable.
But after a party complained in late 2005 about Lamdin's comments, the Maryland Commission on Judicial Disabilities reviewed taped transcripts of Lamdin's hearings and determined that a number of his comments were, crass, profane, sarcastic, disparaging and undignified. The 59-year-old jurist has admitted that he erred, and since 2006 has toned down his colorful commentary considerably. Nonetheless, the Maryland Court of Appeals will hold a hearing next month on whether to impose the 30-day suspension recommended by the commission, writes the Baltimore Sun.
It is reportedly the first time since 1984, when the state's highest court removed a judge from the bench for forging documents, that the court has held such a disciplinary hearing.
According to an earlier article in the Baltimore City Paper, Lamdin's questionable remarks included "comments about children, the Baltimore City judiciary, the Maryland correctional system, the state of Pennsylvania, the Baltimore County Circuit Court and its judges, and drug treatment." At one point, he asked a defendant "Do you think I just came in on the watermelon truck today?" At another, he told a defendant "if there is a pile of shit there you'll step in it," the commission found.
More of the judge's colorful bench commentary is detailed in another City Paper article.
"I now realize how my comments could be viewed as discourteous, undignified and therefore sanctionable," Lamdin wrote in a letter to the commission. "In an attempt to reach criminal defendants with my comments, I talked in language I knew they understood. The comments were not mean-spirited, but I realized I went over the line."
Now "it's not as much fun to be in front of him, and he's not as funny as he used to be," says David Irwin, a criminal defense lawyer. "But it's a serious job, and I understand the commission's point that you have to have the appearance of judiciousness."
(Updated Oct. 19 at 1:42 p.m., CDT.)

Comments
Joseph A.D.
Oct 19, 2007 8:50 AM CST
This is an example of what is wrong with our society. While I do not know the specifics of his comments, political correctness and tiptoeing around people’s sensitivities has gone too far. I think it is also a comment on class separation and the notion that judges are more “civilized” and above the level of most criminals.
Flag this comment
Anonymous
Oct 19, 2007 9:12 AM CST
Hello, ABA Journal? The story is about a judge’s offensive comments. The comments are the heart of the story. The newsworthy facts are what he said. But in your article, none are given. This article stinks. Yes, I get it, you have limited space. I get it. But that’s no excuse for what I would call inept reporting. Please, take notes from, e.g., WSJ law blog. At least they know how to report a story in this format. Whatever.
Flag this comment
Anon
Oct 19, 2007 9:31 AM CST
I totally agree with the previous comment. While I understand that you only have so much time/space to post these articles, if their brevity leads to a complete lack of substance they become completely pointless…
Flag this comment
J.D.
Oct 19, 2007 10:03 AM CST
JUST CLICK ON THE LINK to the story in the Baltimore Sun. Here’s a sampling of the great quotes:
The judge asked a Pennsylvania man caught speeding why every resident of that state “drives like a fool.”
He continued, “What is it up there? Is it in the water? You know, I get on [Interstate] 83 every day, going back and forth to work, and you all go flying by me. What’s the big rush to get back to Pennsylvania? It’s an ugly state.”
AND…
After listening to one man’s account of having too little money to pay a traffic fine, the judge remarked, “So you’re busted, disgusted and can’t be trusted.”
Ha, ha!
And now the judge was forced to go to a re-education camp run by the “Commission on Judicial Disabilities.”
Flag this comment
GED
Oct 19, 2007 10:07 AM CST
I agree with #2 and #3, as to the contention you have limited space, horse feathers! You have plenty of space for an unlimited number of electrons sent out on the world wide web. You also send me countless junk for sale. DO A BETTER JOB
Flag this comment
GH
Oct 19, 2007 11:03 AM CST
Limited space? There does not appear to be any limit to the number or size of the comments.
Flag this comment
dave
Oct 19, 2007 12:03 PM CST
Why are there no examples of his comments? I will never read another ABA journal article again.
Flag this comment
Matt
Oct 19, 2007 2:27 PM CST
What is wrong with a little honesty? Pennsylvania IS ugly. The judge did NOT just fall off a watermelon truck. The broke DF WAS busted, disgusted, and likely could not be trusted! I could understand if the comments were untrue or raciest; that is not the case here. This is just another example of preaching tolerance but, NOT actually being tolerant. Let the judge do his thing; maybe he will reach one or two DF’s!
Flag this comment
Brad
Oct 19, 2007 4:47 PM CST
Comment number 7 is funnier than any of the judge’s choice words. He jumps on the “no examples given” complaint bandwagon, but really takes it over the edge: He’ll never read another ABA journal article again because of it.
Flag this comment
lucien parenteau
Oct 22, 2007 12:50 AM CST
I liked this piece. “More of the judge’s colorful bench commentary is detailed in another City Paper article” made for the rest of the story..
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.