U.S. Supreme Court

Justice Thomas Dissents from Cert Denial in Highway Cross Case, Cites 'Shambles' Precedents


Justice Clarence Thomas sees a lost opportunity to “provide clarity to an establishment clause jurisprudence in shambles” in the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal today to take up a case involving crosses beside a highway.

Thomas dissented (PDF) from the cert denial. At issue is whether privately financed roadside crosses erected to honor fallen highway patrol officers in Utah violate the establishment clause.

A nonprofit group raised private funds to finance 13 crosses, placed where officers had been killed, including alongside highways. The state had granted permission in a permit that said it neither approved nor disapproved of the memorial markers.

The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had found an establishment clause violation. According to Thomas, “the 10th Circuit’s opinion is one of the latest in a long line of ‘religious display’ decisions that, because of this court’s nebulous establishment clause analyses, turn on little more than ‘judicial predilections.’ … Because our jurisprudence has confounded the lower courts and rendered the constitutionality of displays of religious imagery on government property anyone’s guess, I would grant certiorari.”

The case is Utah Highway Patrol Association v. American Atheists. Hat tip to SCOTUSblog and How Appealing.

Previous:
Doubts About Guilt in Shaken Baby Case Don't Justify Reversal, U.S. Supreme Court Says

Next:
Law Prof Is Concerned About Methods of Company Using Genetics to Control Mosquitoes


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Leave a comment
Your screen name.
Your email address.