Legal Ethics

King & Spalding Advised Ex-Glaxo Lawyer Charged With Obstruction, Defense Filing Says


A former lawyer for GlaxoSmithKline Plc now facing an obstruction case is seeking information in discovery from a well-known law firm that advised her on her employer’s behalf, according to a defense filing.

But as lawyers for Lauren Stevens apparently prepare an advice-of-counsel defense, the government is arguing that the defense is irrelevant to her case because obstruction doesn’t require a showing of intent, reports Reuters Legal.

Stevens is accused of providing inaccurate information during a Food & Drug Administration investigation of Glaxo’s marketing of its Wellbutrin antidepressant for off-label uses.

A spokesman for King & Spalding confirmed that Glaxo is a client, but declined to discuss Stevens’ case. A Glaxo representative and Stevens’ counsel also declined to comment when contacted by Reuters.

Earlier coverage:

ABAJournal.com: “Ex-Glaxo Lawyer’s Defense in Criminal Case Raises Tricky Privilege Issues for Company, Experts Say”

Previous:
Rapper Visits Police Station Twice Before Cops Take His Confession in Cold Shooting Case

Next:
Is Plastic Santa's Ho-Ho-Ho (and Singing) Too Loud? N.J. Judge Must Decide


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.