Question of the Week
Last Night a Blog Post Saved My Life
Posted Jul 17, 2008 8:36 AM CST
By Sarah Randag
In light of news that the California Injury Blog's post on an unsolved hit-and-run led to the apprehension of a prime suspect got us to wondering what other influences the legal blogosphere is having.
So we ask...
What's the most useful/helpful thing you’ve ever read on a legal blog or any blog for that matter? Be sure to name the blog so we can check it out.
Answer in the comments below.
Read last week's question and answers about law firm perks.
Our favorite answer from last week:
Posted by Judith Chirlin: "Before I went on the bench I was with a law firm whose founding partner was in his eighties. The other partners were concerned about his driving, but didn’t want to insult him. So they convinced him that the firm needed a driver—so that those of us who made frequent court appearances wouldn’t waste a lot of time finding parking places and then walking to the courthouse. So the driver would drive the senior partner between his home and office each day (in the partner’s car), and during the day he would be available to drop me off at and pick me up from the courthouse, deposition sites, etc. Imagine me, as a young lawyer, being delivered to court in a chaffeur driven Rolls-Royce!"

Comments
kay sieverding
Jul 17, 2008 10:02 AM CST
I believe that my ability to blog has potentially saved my life and my husband’s and son’s. We were subject to witness retaliation and witness intimidation as described in U.S.C. Title 18 sections 1512 and 1513. I was put in jail for 5 months without even being accused of disrupting a hearing or any sort of crime.This was done at the request of Faegre & Benson for the stated reason of stopping us from finding a different judge besides Edward Nottingham, who dismissed our claims without a jury trial and without the defense even filing for summary judgment. Judge N’s stated reason was that our complain was “proliix, disorganized, and legally twisted.” That does not comply with Rule 52a. Also, without a counterclaim or a rule 11 c. 6 order, we were ordered to pay some law firms $102,000. Faegre & Benson and the other law firms filed in Dane County WI that they were defendants in our lawsuit in front of Judge Nottingham, although only 2 of the 6 were and none of them filed a counterclaim. Faegre didn’t even file a rule 11 motion. I think the law firms and the foreign insurance companies they represent thought they were going to get away with witness retaliation and also secure case law to stop U.S. Citizens from representing themselves and that it would never become public. Faegre was representing Mutual Insurance Limited of Bermuda and I suspect there is some sort of agreement with the purchasers of Mutual’s defamation insurance to cover up news related to claims against other publishers insured by Mutual. (I don’t know for sure because they have apparently be able to keep the policies secret despite rule 26a) So blogging has been a way for me to publish what happened. I think it is actually possible that the blogging saved our lives because a.) I could have been murdered in jail b.) Financial stress kills and c.) Given the nasty nasty things my defendants have done to me, it is possible that they would have hired a hit man. Apparently hit men are actually pretty inexpensive. But since I have no other enemies, if I was killed I think people would know to look to my defendants and therefore they would be more reluctant to hire a hit man.
Flag this comment
Wow
Jul 17, 2008 11:41 AM CST
Wow . . .
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jul 17, 2008 1:49 PM CST
Seriously. I think THIS blog might save my life by alerting me to stay away from Kay…
Flag this comment
Hey now
Jul 18, 2008 3:47 AM CST
Its not paranoia if they’re really after you.
Look out behind you Kay!!!
Flag this comment
Hadley V. Baxendale
Jul 18, 2008 4:59 AM CST
You better put on a tin-foil beanie so they can’t read your thoughts, too.
Flag this comment
HVB
Jul 18, 2008 5:15 AM CST
How about opposing counsel’s work product? Some people post questions about cases they have with enough detail that someone else involved in the case might recognize it or the poster’s identity. A standard discovery request should be to disclose any on-line discussions about the case by either the lawyer or client. Get a positive response and say good-bye to privilege!
Flag this comment
Chris
Jul 18, 2008 6:25 AM CST
Great point, HVB.
As a law student who hopes to practice wills/trusts/estate law, I find Gerry Beyer’s blog ( http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/trusts_estates_prof) helpful almost every day. It’s fantastic.
Flag this comment
kay sieverding
Jul 18, 2008 9:07 AM CST
To # 4
I try to avoid unnecessary risks. There was a recent article in the ABA journal about a plaintiff’s lawyer that was apparently murdered by the defense lawyer.
Flag this comment
kay sieverding
Jul 18, 2008 11:11 AM CST
to # 6
So when privilege is waived it is totally waived, not partially waived right?
Flag this comment
coffee drinker
Jul 20, 2008 9:25 AM CST
“ex judge indicted on federal corruption charges” will be helpful to many
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.