Legal Ethics
Law Firm Fined $25K for Trumpeting Reported $17M Settlement
Posted Apr 16, 2009 10:54 AM CST
By Martha Neil
An Arizona appeals court has upheld a $25,000 sanction against a construction law firm that trumpeted to potential clients, without mentioning the exact amount, a confidential settlement of a homeowner stucco suit reported to be around $17 million.
Kasdan Simonds Riley & Vaughan had argued that home builder Del Webb, which was a defendant in the original 2005 litigation, did more than anyone to publicize the settlement: In a lawsuit over the breach of confidentiality, Del Webb attached a copy of a newspaper article reporting the $17 million settlement, citing confidential sources, recounts Capitol Media Services.
But neither the trial court nor the Arizona Court of Appeals found this argument persuasive. Del Webb reasonably expected that the law firm "would not refer to the amount of the settlement, either by stating the exact amount or referring to its size relative to other settlements in Arizona history," says Judge John Gemmill in a written opinion upholding the $25,000 fine.
In an effort to persuade other homeowners of a Scottsdale, Ariz., suburb to pursue similar litigation alleging defective construction work concerning the stucco installed on the exterior of their homes, the Kasdan firm wrote to these other homeowners a few months after the 2005 stucco case settled in August 2007, the article continues. In the letter, the firm said it believed the settlement was "the largest single-family home defect settlement in Arizona history."
Del Webb was unsuccessful, however, in its effort to obtain a more draconian penalty, according to the news service. The appellate court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to ban the Kasdan firm from representing homeowners in further stucco litigation against Del Webb, as the home builder had sought.

Comments
CS
Apr 16, 2009 4:39 PM CST
It seems the purpose—to keep a competent law firm from representing homeowners—failed. Thankfully. I wish someone would expose the tricks that corporate defense lawyers use! I volunteer for a consumer org, and have had many homeowners tell me about behavior by builders lawyers that is an ethics violation. One builder’s lawyer deposed an elderly couple whose home was severely defective, and drilled them on their son’s suicide 20 yrs prior to the case, and had somehow found out the son was gay and dragged that out too. It would ‘seem’ that such questioning would not be allowed to be brought up in trial, assuming things got that far, but the couple was traumatized. They ended up having to give up their case, in part because of the expense, but I suspect in part because of such tactics. No homeowner in the midst of a construction lawsuit has the resources to attack the other side’s lawyers like this. This firm in the article had some very successful cases, I want to say Baker and Didion. The Baker and Didion cases if I recall the names right, were great decisons for homeowners and a blow to the building and warranty industries.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Apr 16, 2009 5:46 PM CST
One of my uncles was a master finish carpenter for fifty years, until his death in 1998. During the last decade of his life, he told me more than once that every time he went shopping for materials, the top grades were down a notch from the time before. One of the best tips he ever gave me was “never buy a new house.”
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.