• Home
  • News
  • Law Grad Without a Credit Card Will Take Bar Exam, Thanks to Calif. Supremes

Law Students

Law Grad Without a Credit Card Will Take Bar Exam, Thanks to Calif. Supremes

Posted Jul 28, 2009 5:24 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

An order issued late Monday by the California Supreme Court has cleared the way for a law graduate without a credit card to take the bar exam today.

Sara Granda, a 29-year-old indigent quadriplegic who receives disability benefits, says she paid the exam fee of $648 with a state-issued check. But the state bar never processed Granda’s online application because she didn’t fill in the space for a credit card number.

Granda was paralyzed in an auto accident, and she uses a wheelchair and a respirator. She graduated from the University of California at Davis law school. She filed suit, first in federal court, when she learned she would not be able to take the bar exam. The case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, and Granda refiled in the state supreme court.

Granda had the support of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who sent a letter to the supreme court asking the justices to allowher to take the exam, the Recorder reports.

The order said Granda should be allowed to take the exam, but she must complete a full application by Sept. 1 so her eligibility can be assessed.

Comments

1.

Doubting Thomas
Jul 28, 2009 11:50 AM CST

I’m shocked and amazed that the Calif. State Bar forced Granda to file suit.  Where were the pragmatists who looked at the situation and refused to make a reasonable accommodation?

Flag this comment

2.

confused
Jul 28, 2009 12:56 PM CST

Why do we want someone who can’t follow simple directions that state a credit card is required to be an attorney?

Flag this comment

3.

Pig Vomit
Jul 28, 2009 1:03 PM CST

Of Course! A credit card is the most importation determining factor in whether or not one can be a member of the California Bar. Don’t we all know from LA Law that all of the lawyers use their credit cards to get just the right suits and briefcases on Rodeo Drive. She should have paid in pennies - good old US legal tender.

Flag this comment

4.

tim
Jul 28, 2009 1:18 PM CST

more proof that

Liberalisim is a mental disorder

Flag this comment

5.

tttony
Jul 28, 2009 1:22 PM CST

and now the CA bar assn and the CA legal establishment can feel good about themselves.

THey are pure evil.

The real issue here is not whether this poor girl will be able to take the bar (and then crash and burn in the “profession” itself (unless she can get a govt sinecure based on her disability), but the way that the legal establishment feels no guilt at all about making the new wannabee lawyers jump through all sorts of arbitrary and unreasonable hoops.

Evil.

Flag this comment

6.

B. McLeod
Jul 29, 2009 4:31 PM CST

When I was a new law grad, I did not have a credit card either, but my state did not require that as a qualification for admission.

I guess California wants to make sure all their lawyers understand credit and being in debt, since that appears to be integral to their entire state system.

Flag this comment

7.

HT
Jul 31, 2009 4:45 AM CST

who cares, CA is a cesspole.  Perhaps she should have issued an IOU as I hear that is a form of monetary debt in that liberal cesspole.

Flag this comment

8.

Richard Jack
Jul 31, 2009 5:29 AM CST

Anybody who has the guts to get through UCD with her conditions only to get slammed by the CABar ought to consider going to another state: someplace where a brain coupled with courage is appreciated.  There are 49 of those plus the US territories and DC.  When she passes the damn bar she ought to give those pukes the metaphorical finger.

Flag this comment

9.

Miriam Null
Jul 31, 2009 5:38 AM CST

As an old time law grad (‘49)I cannot believe that having a credit card number is a requirement of the CA bar! what happened to good old US cash?

Flag this comment

10.

chuck
Jul 31, 2009 6:13 AM CST

Obviously she didn’t learn much in her time at UC Davis :snicker @ the dismissal.

Flag this comment

11.

Marty
Jul 31, 2009 6:43 AM CST

Credit cards are fine, but WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Flag this comment

12.

chubbs
Jul 31, 2009 7:14 AM CST

looks like she’ll have trouble with the civil procedure section.

Flag this comment

13.

John S.
Jul 31, 2009 7:20 AM CST

I don’t really understand the relevance of her physical disability in the story, nor the repeated slams about liberalism.  The CA bar, trying modernize the application process, developed an on-line application, which generally requires a credit card.  The stupidity on CA’s part is not planning for an alternative payment method.  Very short sighted.  I agree it is pretty ridiculous that she had to file suit to be able to pay by certified check.

Flag this comment

14.

Dave
Jul 31, 2009 7:26 AM CST

Re comment No. 11.:  Win.

Flag this comment

15.

Diggity
Jul 31, 2009 7:37 AM CST

Ha.  Comment 12 regarding civil procedure for the win. 

I am at a loss to see what this has to do with “liberalism.”  But this is really stupid; they should applaud her for not being a part of the millions upon millions with cc debt.

Flag this comment

16.

wraparound
Jul 31, 2009 8:03 AM CST

Calf. requiring credit card?  that’s absurd…I hate credit card companies…charging people 24-29% interest rates…that’s criminal!!!!
I have torn all my cards up and don’t owe a dime…btw…I never got in any credit trouble…ever…I just pay cash.  Also, I have been a lawyer for obver 20 years.  As far a a Bar Assn. being called liberal…there is probably more conservatives in the bar than liberals…

Flag this comment

17.

Brian Levy
Jul 31, 2009 8:04 AM CST

I’m not sure if to practice in CA you have to graduate from an ABA school, when I was in school, it was not required. If it is still the case I find it amusing and odd that one can graduate from a non-approved school and practice law but, not even be allowed to take the exam if one does not have a credit card. 

Not so amusing is that the State bar had to waste her time and the State’s more than limited resources in proceedings when simple business sense and logic would have lead to the same result.  Maybe the State bar management team of whomever made the decision forcing her to litigate the matter should be added to the unemployment line.  How could a lawyer respect the individual(s) and accept them as their regulators.

Flag this comment

18.

RD
Jul 31, 2009 8:14 AM CST

Somewhere the ghost of Kafka is smiling.

Flag this comment

19.

sue
Jul 31, 2009 8:53 AM CST

Diggity - you’re right, this doesn’t have anything to do with liberalism. There are just some people who like to blame liberalism for the world’s ills in every post, rather than add anything meaningful to the discussion. Sad, really.

Flag this comment

20.

JN
Jul 31, 2009 8:54 AM CST

#16,

Why bad mouth credit cards.  In your position, you could have several credit cards, pay the balances off each month and owe no interest or fees.  In fact, you could probably swing a rebate deal where the credit card companies pay you.  If you want to avoid the hassle of writing checks to the CC company each month, set up auto-debit at the bank.  (Presumably you do maintain a bank account, even though banks have been known to charge interest and fees as well.)  Having a credit card can also make your life easier when it comes to things like checking into hotels or renting cars.  Finally, credit card companies can aid your accounting for tax purposes (remember the IRS), providing detailed payment info which can be downloaded monthly into your accounting software.  Credit cards are not worthy of hate, they are just a tool; it is all up to the user as to how the tool is used.

Flag this comment

21.

B. McLeod
Jul 31, 2009 9:14 AM CST

Highly valid point, JN.  Credit cards are great for those of us who don’t really need them.  It’s fun to use the bank’s money free for 30 days.  They’re floating my last purchase of computer equipment right now.  About a year ago, I actually toyed with the idea of charging an auto purchase, but I thought that would probably really annoy the dealer (already upset that I didn’t want their great “financing” package).  I say, as long as you can get a card with no annual fee, and a 30-day grace period, make hay while the sun shines.  The only downside is they do like to capture and sell data on what you purchase.

Flag this comment

22.

Jonathan Rhein
Jul 31, 2009 9:43 AM CST

This seems to be an attention-getting lawsuit.  Hint: she surely has a bank account.  If so, she has a debit card with the Visa symbol.  That’s how I paid for my CA bar exam.

Flag this comment

23.

rs
Jul 31, 2009 9:52 AM CST

Ding Ding, we have a winner - Mr. Rhein.  If someone is on disability, and especially given her condition, then it gets directly deposited (or if she receives a check by someone who assists her) in an account.  I can’t think of one bank that doesn’t issue a visa debit card with the account.

Flag this comment

24.

T.R.Thompson
Jul 31, 2009 10:05 AM CST

Congratulations to Sara! I hope she aces the exam! It’s unfortunate that she was made to file suit in order to sit for the bar. Law school is hard under ordinary circumstances and so for Sara to get through and graduate is fantastic! I used to be a notetaker for one of my fellow law students who was in a similar physical situation as Sara. It warms my heart to hear of her success! Oh yeah, just because you have a bank account does not mean that you have a debit card. It is not mandatory to carry the plastic. There may be a very good reason why she does not have one. Besides - as it has been said - what happened to good old greenbacks anyway? Didn’t the CA bar examiners take commercial paper?

Flag this comment

25.

JN
Jul 31, 2009 10:11 AM CST

#21,

I didn’t mention that I also run my office rent through my credit card.  At the rate that I pay, that is the equivalent of buying a very nice new car per year.  If my landlord didn’t like it, they could refuse, but hey, they seem happy as the rent is never late and avoiding the hassles and risks of collection probably makes up for the CC fees they pay.

Flag this comment

26.

J.D.
Jul 31, 2009 10:12 AM CST

The fact that the libs on here don’t understand why this is a liberal issue illustrates that liberalism, in fact, is a mental disorder.

California is a state run by liberals. The CalBar is run by liberals. The judges in the area are almost all liberals. And one of the lone republicans in the state—Schwarzenegger—is coming to her defense.

Or, perhaps the fact that that the state’s Department of Rehabilitation (run by liberals) “has paid for her post-high school education – three college degrees” is the sign of a liberal mental disorder; the state’s billions in debt, and taxpayers are footing these bills? The liberal-run state is ALSO paying for all bar exam fees.

How can the state afford this? Answer: it can’t. Liberals are running California’s economy like drunk shopaholics with credit cards.

Flag this comment

27.

Justice
Jul 31, 2009 10:18 AM CST

Why is a credit card required to take the CA bar exam? The story just says its required on the application but doesn’t say why the CA Bar requires it so I’m curious. There is no correlation between having and not having a credit card to taking the exam. This is a form of discrimination against those who choose not to have a credit card. The CA Bar has always been an unusual and elitest group, not only with the application process but the exam itself…I took it and its grading so subjective that my score was so close it had to be subjectively read again and well, I didn’t pass. If you do pass then there is the lengthy background check. All the while they charge charge charge for everything (pun intended)

Flag this comment

28.

gea
Jul 31, 2009 10:27 AM CST

This article shows how hypocritical this country is. It appears that it is okay for a governor (Schwarzenegger) to issue a memo criticizing the actions of a legislative body, California Bar Examiners and write a letter interceding on a citizen’s behalf, but it is not okay for a president (Obama) to criticize the actions of an executive body, police employee in handling a citizen who returned from China to find his front door inoperable. I wonder if the California Courts are going to stage SIT-INS to signal their outrage over the California’s governor but-inski-ism? Who cares what the police employee’s motives are or disabled law student’s motives are in not getting a debit card. What matters is that the police employee should have talked to th Harvard professor or gotten someone else to do it, if it was not in his ability to deescalate the situation. Before the tax payers were charged for fighting Granda’s or soon Gate’s arguments of discrimination. Strongarmism appears to be the modus operandi over pragmatism. I hope that California and Massachusetts have learned their respective lessons.

Flag this comment

29.

J.D.
Jul 31, 2009 11:04 AM CST

27, the CalBar claims the requirement is in a statute somewhere. Either from the state legislature, or from the bar examiners themselves, I don’t know. But either way, it was a creation of liberals.

28, you need to take a basic government class. There’s this little thing called federalism that is relevant in the Obama acting stupidly case; it was a state police force, and Obama works for the federal government. Big difference, different jurisdictions, if you will.

In the CalBar case, we’re talking about one state, same jurisdiction.

Flag this comment

30.

prosecute1966
Jul 31, 2009 11:14 AM CST

Everyone who is suggesting that she use a debit card instead of a credit card might be missing or ignoring that the article said she is INDIGENT.  That may mean she has no bank account—certainly it is not a requirement to be licensed that she have one.  As far as filling out the application and sending it in goes, the article also said she is a quadriplegic—perhaps writing is difficult when your upper limbs are paralyzed (while there are ways for a quad to use a computer).  Sweet lord, people, is this what our profession has become?  Are lawyers really the obnoxious, cynical, obstructionists that the public thinks we are?  If this woman made it through law school, and is capable of passing a bar exam, then we should give her a big YEE HAW and applaud her tenacity and intelligence.  How many have been able-bodied and couldn’t keep up in law school—this woman made without the use of her arms or legs.  Big ups to her.  Cali could quite simply offer to make a relatively small accommodation without doing violence to their bureaucratic efficiency.

Flag this comment

31.

B. McLeod
Jul 31, 2009 11:40 AM CST

#30, JD will give her a big HEE HAW!

(That’s all he’s capable of).

Flag this comment

32.

gea
Jul 31, 2009 12:18 PM CST

Number 29, Free speech is the right to call someone a dolt or criticize a court or police employee’s behavior.  It doesn’t matter whether you are governor, president or U.S. senator. If George Bush read or heard about a English-American woman of European descent not being allowed to vote in Massachusetts because she didn’t have a bank account, credit card or debit card and he expressed an opinion that based on what he read or heard, the reaction of the police employee or court employees was wrong, I think he would ‘go’ for it. If it turned out both parties were wrong, it would not change the fact that the employees did not handle the situation properly, in order to avoid the tax payers shelling out lots of money to defend against discrimination suits, which could have been easily avoided by a dose of pragmatism.

Flag this comment

33.

anon
Jul 31, 2009 12:53 PM CST

The devastating part is that the State paid for her to receive her under grad degree, her masters degree, and her law degree. If she did not get a job from the first 2 degrees, it is unlikely that passing the bar will suddenly open all the doors to gainful employment.

The state paid $4700 for bar courses and pays her disability.  Here is the cashed version of the article in the Sac Bee: http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:zRTN_VuGrdUJ:www.sacbee.com/291/story/2054829.html+Paralyzed+UC+Davis+law+grad+says+State+Bar+is+barrier+to+bar&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.

She was responsible for the accident that injured her in the first place but she sued and lost, trying to blame the car company for not making a stronger car.  She is a sad story.

Flag this comment

34.

Pedro
Jul 31, 2009 2:00 PM CST

Under Obama we should get free college education.  Why should the white man make us pay to get a college education?  Life will only be good when we are all equal and have the same .

Flag this comment

35.

J.D.
Jul 31, 2009 3:16 PM CST

#30 (prosecute1966) brings up a good point.

If she was really INDIGENT she would not have an address. And I know that the CalBar application requires an address.

So she must have been able to come up with one (homeless shelter, friend’s home), and she easily could have used it for a debit card.

Banks will open accounts for anyone these days.

Flag this comment

36.

Vicki821
Jul 31, 2009 4:55 PM CST

NUMBER 30:  Thank you for demonstrating that there still exists sympathy for those less fortunate, especially for someone like this woman, who graduated from law school and passed the bar!
NUMBER 33:  Do you think that just because she may have been at fault for the accident that rendered her a quadriplegic that means that her condition is any less tragic?  I guess you have never made a driving error, right?  Furthermore, your comments about the state paying for her bar courses, education, and disability makes it sound like you think she is lucky.  I guess you would love to be in her position, huh?  Lastly, I was most disgusted by your comment that if her first 2 degrees did not help her get a job, it is “unlikely that passing the bar will suddenly open all the doors to gainful employment.”  What is wrong with you???

Flag this comment

37.

Ed
Jul 31, 2009 7:43 PM CST

We should all applaud. The gov’t will stop doling out the disability benefits when she gets a job. She can have the satisfaction of being a valued, productive member of society. She already has accomplished more than many of her classmates who will pass the bar without having prosecuted a case in court. A little something called practical experience.

Flag this comment

38.

John Martin
Jul 31, 2009 7:59 PM CST

Wow, I feel like I have been slapped in the face by the great majority of posters who apparently have no empathy for this young woman. As to “...banks will open accounts for anyone these days.” 1) this is Wrong, if an applicant has either bad credit or tax problems then the bank will probably not open an account for the individual and 2) even if the bank opens an account for an individual the “debit card” is not automatically approved if an account is opened. Sometimes the debit card will not be issued. There are many individuals who would like to have a checking account but do not for thiis reason or other reasons. Any money placed in a checking account is considered an asset and is subject to garnishment, etc. Again this woman is “indigent” which doesn’t mean that she is necessarily “homeless”; that is not the legal determinant of indigence. As to Cal Bars stupidity of refusing to make a reasonable accomadation for individuals in extraordinary circumstances is sad and mind bogging. By the way even if it is in the CA statute that requires an electronic payment for the CA bar exam fee clearly they weren’t thinking. U.S. currency is “Legal Tender” good for all debts public and private in the United States. CA is a U.S. state. CA does not require graduation from an ABA Law school to take the CA Bar Exam. Also CA does not require any prior college degree, only sixty semester hours of college credit or successfully taking and passing the CLEP exams, in order to qualify to attend law school or take the CA Bar Exam.  I totally agree with Vicki821 I think those who attacked this young lady should take some classes on empathy and ethics. Probably wouldn’t hurt to watch “The Rainmaker” and “To Kill A Mockingbird”

Flag this comment

39.

BMF
Aug 1, 2009 1:35 AM CST

#35: “Indigent” means lacking necessities due to impoverishment.

For the rest of the posters who were wondering why someone might not have a credit card: This woman is a quadriplegic due to traumatic injury. Invariably, these injuries require the sort of health care and maintenance that are not covered by most health plans, and that very few people can afforc to pay for out-of-pocket. In CA, the state will only pay for such care if the patient is INDIGENT—which means that the recipient of such care cannot have more than a couple of thousand dollars in cash or assets of any kind. No assets, no credit. It’s as simple as that. Welcome to the wonderful world of the profoundly disabled.

#38: As for the “brain trust” that is the State Bar of California, suffice it to say that their collective disregard for the intelligence and social utility of the disabled never ceases to amaze me.

Flag this comment

40.

Caroline
Aug 2, 2009 12:25 PM CST

What this article fails to mention is that she had sought and received assurance that her application could be processed with a check and not a credit card, which means the lack of processing the application is a result of a failure of communication that was not her responsibility.

Flag this comment

41.

J.D.
Aug 3, 2009 9:35 AM CST

“Wow” to you, #38. You’re upset we don’t have empathy for the young woman, but you think we SHOULD have empathy since she’s a tax dodger or screwed up her credit?

You wrote, “if an applicant has either bad credit or tax problems then the bank will probably not open an account.”

Okay, so this has nothing to do with her physical problems. Why should we be sympathetic for a person with credit or tax problems? Perhaps a “that sucks” is in order, but how about she gets her finances in order before becoming a lawyer?

Hell, considering WE all payed for her education and multiple degrees, and apparently her medical care according to #39,  I’m wondering what excuse she has for her bad credit and tax problems. I know my FICO score would be much better if the taxpayer footed my education bills.

Flag this comment

42.

DR
Aug 3, 2009 11:37 AM CST

J.D.:  Another well-thoughout post. (?)  No one states in this article or elsewhere that Sara had bad credit or was a tax dodger.  In fact, No. 38 was only implying that banks in general are wary of opening accounts for people with tax or credit problems. 

Sara became paralyzed when she was seventeen.  She spent most of the last twelve years in facilities because she cannot even scratch her nose.  I highly doubt that she has even applied for a credit card in her short life.  If she hasn’t offered an excuse for her so-called “credit and tax problems,”  it is probably because she doesn’t have any.  I don’t care if you have problems with her disability payments or state-funded education….but please, don’t go off on a tangent that has no known factual basis but present it as fact.  Are things slow over on “Above the Law?”

Flag this comment

43.

Esq.
Aug 3, 2009 12:10 PM CST

It seems that a lot of states have nonsensical bar-exam requirements, like references from every employer since age 12, and drivers license abstracts from every state that you’ve ever passed through on vacation.

Flag this comment

44.

J.D.
Aug 3, 2009 1:01 PM CST

That’s my point, Durrr.

There isn’t much evidence here, BUT #38 claims we are insensitive while simultaneously suggesting that she may have tax or credit problems.

I’m sorry, but I’m not going to feel sympathy for someone if they’ve failed to pay taxes, bills, etc.

Flag this comment

45.

Uselss JD
Aug 3, 2009 5:25 PM CST

Uhh… in response to JD at #26, Bush, republican congress of 6 years, and cons. ran the US economy to the ground.  Bush turned a US surplus to a record deficit. 

So I guess “shopshopaholics with credit cards”  describe Bush, republican, cons. or neo cons, very well. 

Burns!

Flag this comment

46.

J.D.
Aug 4, 2009 9:35 AM CST

Yes, #45, as I’ve explained to you multiple times, Bush behaved like a drunken liberal. That’s what neocons are: liberals in Republican clothing. We call them RINOs.

This is why conservatives—actual conservatives—gave Bush such a low approval rating. That’s why conservatives did not come out to vote for McCain—he’s another RINO.

The fact is, no Democrats can run a country (or a state), and only half of Republicans (the conservative ones) can do a decent job.

Flag this comment

47.

AndytheLawyer
Aug 4, 2009 3:20 PM CST

JD: If Songbird McCain and Quitter Palin had gotten elected, we’d now be in far worse shape than we are with Kenyan Obama and Gabby Biden.

Flag this comment

48.

MzCaliAttorney
Aug 7, 2009 9:02 AM CST

CA State Vocational Rehabilitation paid for her to take the bar and for her law school education, the state only issues payments directly to vendors via CHECK, that’s why there was know credit card information, instead the State Bar of California was issued a check from The State of California…Cali were supposed to be advanced, get it together!

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.