• Home
  • News
  • Lawyers Say Embarrassing Voice Mail of Marvell GC May Have Been Edited

Legal Ethics

Lawyers Say Embarrassing Voice Mail of Marvell GC May Have Been Edited

Posted May 7, 2009 6:05 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A voice mail message by lawyers on a speakerphone that didn’t get disconnected before some embarrassing discussions took place is being challenged by a company that wants to keep the recording out of an upcoming trade secrets trial.

Lawyers for Marvell Semiconductor say the tape should be tossed because it may have been edited, the Recorder reports. The company’s forensic expert says there are several instances where there is a complete loss of signal—a finding consistent with editing.

The lawyers caught on tape were Matthew Gloss, then the general counsel of Marvell Semiconductor, and one of its intellectual property lawyers, Eric Janofsky, the Recorder says. The lawyers and an engineer had phoned a lawyer for rival Jasmine Networks, and left a voice mail message when she didn't answer. Jasmine had been in negotiations to sell its technology and engineers to Marvell, and the details were protected by a nondisclosure pact, according to a 2001 account of the recording in Fortune.

Gloss thought he hung up, but it didn’t happen, the stories recount. The conversation among the three continued to be recorded. According to a California appeals court, the trio "openly discussed theft of Jasmine's trade secrets and the unlawful hiring of the engineering group as well as the potential consequence of jail for the conduct.” The court ruled that the attorney-client privilege for the conversation had been waived.

Marvell is represented by Latham & Watkins, which filed the new motion seeking to exclude the tape. “The lawyers don't detail whether or not there is an 18-minute, 20-second gap in the voice mail recording,” the Recorder story says. “Nor do they blame it on former President Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, who supposedly erased part of the infamous Watergate tape accidentally when she hit the record button.”

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
May 7, 2009 7:28 AM CST

Just masterful there.  Oh.  Ow.  Ouch.

Flag this comment

2.

K.
May 7, 2009 9:55 AM CST

May have been edited, eh?  And invisible monkeys might be flying out of my butt right now, but I don’t think so. 

That is really reaching into the bottom of the barrel of potential excuses.  That’s right up there with “We were rehearsing for a play in which characters with our names contemplated stealing your trade secrets.”  (Wait a minute, I think “rehearsing for a play” is actually MORE plausible.  Did you not think of that one?  Too late now.)

Just settle, give the other party whatever they want.  Take your punishment.  It’ll probably mean the demise of your company, but them’s the breaks.

Flag this comment

3.

Kevin
May 8, 2009 7:47 AM CST

GC for a technology company and his bonehead IP co-counsel couldn’t figure out how to disconnect from a rival’s voicemail before discussing stealing trade secrets and entire divisions of the company.  The irony is so delicious, it tastes like a… like a cheeseburger!

Flag this comment

4.

Pete Clarke
May 8, 2009 9:17 AM CST

Not to nit-pick the ABA editors, but is this really just an “embarrassing” voice mail?  Embarrassing might be when the GC lets out a little burp during a business luncheon. I’d say this was a “damning” voice-mail.

Flag this comment

5.

R
May 8, 2009 10:57 AM CST

No no no, K: they weren’t rehearsing for a play. Instead the part that got cropped out was where Gloss said: “You know what, Janofsky? I’m glad we’re such an upright, ethical and honest firm that we would never, EVER think of saying…”

Next we’ll be hearing that Gloss’ Bruno Maglis were photoshopped.

Flag this comment

6.

B. McLeod
May 8, 2009 9:35 PM CST

Or, they cut off the last sentence, “Yes, we COULD do all that, but it would be wrong.”

Flag this comment

7.

K.
May 9, 2009 12:55 PM CST

I love this site sometimes.  You guys just made my day.  :-)

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.