Trials & Litigation
Libel Suit Over Foie Gras Video That Prompted ‘Silliest Law’ Settles
Posted Jun 18, 2009 6:50 AM CST
By Molly McDonough
A suit filed by an animal rights activist who claims he was defamed by a California-based foie gras producer has settled for an undisclosed sum.
Underlying the issues in the suit was a reportedly gruesome video that spurred a national debate and led to a short-lived ordinance in Chicago barring foie gras from restaurant menus, the Chicago Tribune reports.
Not long after the ordinance was enacted, Mayor Richard Daley said the ban on the duck and goose liver delicacy was "the silliest law the City Council has ever passed." Council members ultimately bowed to pressure and reversed the ban in May of last year. But the libel case lived on and was headed to trial this week in Cook County Circuit Court.
The 5-minute video in question, shot by Bryan Pease and members of the San Diego-based Animal Protection and Rescue League, reportedly shows ducks being force-fed and attacked by rats. In the suit, Pease alleged Guillermo Gonzalez, the owner of Sonoma Foie Gras, libeled him in a 2005 Tribune article in which Gonzalez was quoted saying Pease's video was staged.

Comments
B. McLeod
Jun 18, 2009 8:40 AM CST
Maybe the defendants will find a way to a-Pease him. If not, there will probably be pro-geese demonstrators outside the court, chanting “No Justice, no Pease.”
Flag this comment
J. Booker
Jun 19, 2009 10:05 AM CST
Published accounts of farming practices on the 4 US foie gras farms suggest that they are well run. Pease and other vegan activist organizations, including the Humane Society of the US, have apparently used litigation in an attempt to bankrupt this industry. [See Mark Caro’s _Foie Gras Wars_. cf: his account of Israel’s ill-informed supreme court justices in that country’s decision to ban foie gras.]
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.