Careers
Meet Orly Taitz: Lawyer, Dentist and Birther in ‘Alice in Wonderland’ Crusade
Posted Oct 6, 2009 9:06 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Lawyer Orly Taitz’s lawsuit challenging President Obama’s right to hold office has so provoked a federal judge that he compared her crusade to Alice in Wonderland.
Yet Taitz has emerged by some accounts as the most visible face of the movement seeking to prove that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is ineligible to be president, the Washington Post reports. She has “developed a scenario” in which Obama’s mother persuaded bureaucrats to alter his birth records and allow him into the United States. Or perhaps he is a citizen of Indonesia, she says, where Obama lived for a time with his mother.
Taitz works out of a law office in Rancho Santo Margarita, Calif., that is right next to her dental office with the name Appealing Dentistry. According to the Post, she is a “dentist, lawyer, wife of a software executive, mother of three and a leading proponent of the so-called birther campaign.”
A Georgia judge threatened Taitz with a $10,000 sanction for filing a frivolous suit on behalf of an Army captain who says Obama lacks power to deploy her to Iraq. "Unlike in ‘Alice in Wonderland,’ " wrote U.S. District Judge Clay Land, "simply saying something is so does not make it so." She later withdrew as the captain’s lawyer, and is now focusing on a different case filed on behalf of “a slew of plaintiffs,” the story says.
Taitz grew up in the former Soviet republic of Moldova, then moved to Israel, where she met her future husband when he was visiting from the United States, the Post story says. He proposed on their second date, which wasn’t surprising, Taitz confessed, because "he wasn't the first one" who had asked.
While she is attracting media attention for her lawsuits, most of her calls on the morning of the Washington Post interview are from dentists desperate for a job. Taitz, whose co-counsel compares her to the warrior goddess Athena, makes for good press, the Post observes.
“Today Taitz, 49, is wearing white high-heeled slingbacks; bare legs; a white skirt; black and white shirt; enormous eyelashes; and her characteristic air of charming but ferocious tenacity, part Meg Ryan, part Madame Defarge,” the Post says.
Yet some express fears that Taitz is attracting the attention of militia groups and others who don’t confine their protests to lawsuits. Said Robert Haggard, a frequent poster to the Politijab website, "We don't believe that Orly herself is dangerous; the problem is, she is attracting these people who are, and have a history of being so."
For her part, Taitz speaks of fears of repressive regimes and conspiracies. According to the Post, “her rhetoric is laced with a suspicion that Obama may be an agent for a foreign power, a modern Manchurian candidate.”
Corrected at 12:12 p.m. CT to say that Land is a Georgia judge.

Comments
associate
Oct 6, 2009 10:15 AM CST
Nice hit piece. Never question Dear Leader.
Could you at least put some information in the hit piece instead of just platitudes and character assassination?
“A California judge threatened Taitz with a $10,000 sanction for filing a frivolous suit on behalf of an Army captain who says Obama lacks power to deploy her to Iraq. “Unlike in ‘Alice in Wonderland,’ ” wrote U.S. District Judge Clay Land, “simply saying something is so does not make it so.” She later withdrew as the captain’s lawyer, and is now focusing on a different case filed on behalf of “a slew of plaintiffs,” the story says.”
This is more confusing than enlightening. What happened?
Flag this comment
Time
Oct 6, 2009 10:20 AM CST
“For her part, Taitz speaks of fears of repressive regimes and conspiracies.”
I think she is sensing the fear people would have if she had any power over important things.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Oct 6, 2009 11:10 AM CST
Taitz: An arse.
Flag this comment
Bschorr
Oct 6, 2009 11:19 AM CST
@Associate - you could just read Judge Land’s opinion if you really wanted to know. I’m not sure if Ms. Taitz is just a publicity hound or if she sincerely believes this nonsense. Either way I think her argument has been asked and answered and she needs to stop wasting court time with it.
Flag this comment
Paul
Oct 6, 2009 11:57 AM CST
The birthers, the tea baggers, the screamers, and the deathers continued extreme minority presence will become tiresome to mainstream America, if it has not already done so. To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true, if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it. In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”. I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Sanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC).
Flag this comment
KMM
Oct 6, 2009 1:08 PM CST
This is to Paul, poster of comment #5:
A quick search shows that your comment is a canned-comment, one that appears in very many forums over the course of many weeks.
For one who believes that “The birthers, the tea baggers, the screamers, and the deathers continued extreme minority presence will become tiresome to mainstream America” aren’t you over-expending your energy to locate such articles/blogs and then posting your copy/pasted canned response? If of such small-minded interest, why track the topic and respond at all? Hmmmm?
And what’s “extreme minority presence”, i.e. very small? Or rather did you just desire to use the word “extreme” somewhere?
Flag this comment
AndytheLawyer
Oct 6, 2009 1:14 PM CST
I’ll give this very silly woman 8 months and four more birther lawsuits dismissed for lack of standing before some federal judge rules her to be a vexatious litigant.
Flag this comment
24AheadDotCom
Oct 6, 2009 1:15 PM CST
Here’s a question for lawyers: if I were on the other side in a law case and I tried to pretend that a picture on my website of a document was the same thing as the actual paper document, wouldn’t you point out how I was wrong?
Now see this:
http://24ahead.com/liza-mundy-wapo-lies-about-obama-certificate-splc-joins
It’s odd how many lawyers and others suddenly show sloppy thinking when it breaks Obama’s way.
Flag this comment
Bean Counter
Oct 6, 2009 5:39 PM CST
In response to all birthers and all birthers supporters, birhter claim is nothing new. It has been used against other Presidents before Obama. But you have the same problem with those who failed in the past against other Presidents, as in most litigation, the plaintiff carry the initial burden of proof or production.
This lady seems like a smart person (a lawyer and a dentist). But she must have failed to pay attention in her law school classes on litigations.
Flag this comment
Bean Counter
Oct 6, 2009 6:04 PM CST
Altough I am no immigration attorney, if Obama is not born in the U.S., that would mean Obama is a “naturalized citizen.” A naturalized citizen must have applications filed with the USCIS (or formerly INS).
It is not that hard for the government to find out whether a person is naturalized or not, so you would think any oppoent of Obama (either McCain or Hillary) would have done so already.
Being foreign born herself, Ms. Taitz should have known this before advancing her claims.
Flag this comment
Paul
Oct 6, 2009 7:34 PM CST
We are all adults here, and as adults we know there are consequences for are actions, so if you do not agree with his policies, you can a) do nothing, b) support him, c) not support him, d) protest and picket, its your choice, live the dream! As for Orly Taitz, to this point she has not been successful because she does not have any proof, documentation supporting her claims except her wild rants. I would not bet the farm on this one. She has a mail-order-degree get someone with real credentials (Harvard, Yale Law School) not a crazy Russian immigrant with dual US/ Israel citizenship (where are her allegiances?). Have you even thought of who is paying for all these legal filings, her travel and all her wigs? Sorry she has no juice because she does not have any proof, documentation supporting her claims except her wild rants. I heard they are now playing the victim card as well. Please, feel sorry for us the “Birth Certificate” that we built our entire case around and that we have been dancing around turn out to be a big “Fake”. Her material might work on “Fake News” but not in a Court of the United States.
Flag this comment
AndytheLawyer
Oct 7, 2009 9:57 AM CST
Responding to #10—Not so. Example = a baby born to two united states citizen parents while not in the USA (e.g. John McCain, who was born in the Panama Canal Zone) is neither born in the USA nor naturalized—and yet is a U.S. citizen.
Flag this comment
Bean Counter
Oct 7, 2009 11:22 AM CST
I agree with Andy @12 about McCain’s case. My point is that if Obama’s situation is like McCain, Obama can be the President as much as McCain can be the President.
But if Obama’s situation is different from McCain, there will be naturalization applications filed.
Flag this comment
anonymous
Oct 7, 2009 2:10 PM CST
13, you would be correct. However, Obama was not born to American parents. Only his mother was American. And the argument goes that Obama’s long form birth certificate was obtained at a time later than actual birth based on information supplied by the mother, when in fact, he was born overseas and then brought back before applying for a birth certificate.
You’ll also note that none of his college papers have been opened up. The argument there is that he applied for aid based on foreign born status.
This may all be total crap, but until you see the original records (or copies of them), how can anyone know for sure?
Flag this comment
AndytheLawyer
Oct 8, 2009 8:27 AM CST
#14—The conventional wisdom is that George W. Bush was born in New England to U.S. citizen parents. But I contend that in truth he was born in Romania to gypsies and then smuggled into the USA as an infant, after which George H.W. and Barbara Bush adopted him. Your disagreement would lack foundation since you have never seen W’s birth certificate.
And so it goes.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Oct 8, 2009 2:26 PM CST
I think there could be something to Andy’s theory. It is also possible that the Romanian baby (or perhaps, the dyslexic offspring of some dark faeries) was secretly exchanged for George and Barbara’s real infant. There is support for this theory in the fact that the term “changeling” (denoting an infant so secretly exchanged) also has, as an archaic meaning “a person of deficient intelligence.”
Flag this comment
Paul the Magyar
Oct 9, 2009 4:36 PM CST
All these smears are simply intended to delegitimize this President. The conservative movement in this country is constantly concocting schemes to delegitimize this President: He was born in Kenya, he is the Anti-Christ, he is a Muslim sleeper terrorist, he is a closet communist, etc. One might think I made up these ridiculous smears because they are so easy to discredit. Easy to discredit for thinking people, yes. It is more difficult to make these smears disappear. Why?
Well, as Adolph Hitler famously said, “All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true in itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.”
That is how a decorated combat veteran - John Kerry - becomes a coward, traitor and fraud.
A delegitimized President can be called a liar at a joint session of Congress. A delegitimized President can be ridiculed for making a pitch for the Olympic games. A delegitimized President can be ridiculed for winning the Nobel Peace Prize. A delegitimized President can be called on repeatedly to prove his citizenship. A delegitimized President can justifiably be assassinated. Yes, that is the pernicious and outrageous goal of some of these home-grown terrorists. “Would assasination not be justified (they ask) if the President really IS the Anti-Christ?” Or “If he really IS a communist dictator looking for an opportunity to seize total power?”
Lets be honest: That is what some of these obnoxious, dangerous terrorists are promoting.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.