• Home
  • News
  • Obama Eliminates ‘Enemy Combatant’ from DOJ Legal Lexicon

Terrorism

Obama Eliminates ‘Enemy Combatant’ from DOJ Legal Lexicon

Posted Mar 13, 2009 3:41 PM CST
By Martha Neil

In a U-turn from the language of the Bush administration, the White House has eliminated the use of the term "enemy combatant" concerning terrorism suspects being held at the U.S. military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. At the same time, the White House may also have strengthened the legal standard that must be met to continue their incarceration.

The change in policy was revealed by a U.S. Department of Justice filing made in response to a federal judge's request for a definition by today of the term "enemy combatant," reports the Washington Post.

Under the new policy, the DOJ says, it will seek to detain only suspects who "substantially supported" the Taliban, al-Qaida or associated terrorist groups, or were involved in mounting the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the newspaper explains. Formerly, the Bush administration contended it had the power to detain anyone who provided support to these groups or others others "engaged in hostilities" against this country and U.S. allies.

This change in terminology is a distinction without a difference, however, says Human Rights First CEO and Executive Director Elisa Massimino in a press release:

"The new definition of persons who may be held without charge does not differ in any fundamental respects from the old one, and it significantly distorts important traditional law of war distinctions between international and non-international armed conflict," she states. "The concept of indefinite detention without criminal charge continues, and the class of persons to be detained remains ill-defined and overly broad."

However, the DOJ was right to eliminate use of the enemy combatant term, says Massimino, and she urges the Obama administration to "make a clean break from the policies of the past" by narrowing the new standard further.

A subsequent New York Times article offers a similar analysis of the new legal standard:

“This seems fundamentally consistent with the positions of the prior administration,” attorney Steven Engel tells the newspaper. Until the final days of the Bush administration, he was a senior lawyer in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel and was responsible for handling detainee issues.

Regardless of the definitional language used, "the important point is that they recognize that we can detain members of the enemy” in a wartime situation, says Engel.

A copy of the DOJ legal memorandum filed today in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is provided by the Blog of Legal Times. The law blog also discusses the memorandum in a post.

Additional coverage:

Associated Press: "Obama admin. to end use of term 'enemy combatant'"

Bloomberg: "Obama Drops ‘Enemy Combatant’ Term for Guantanamo Detainees"

CNN: "U.S. reverses policy, drops 'enemy combatant' term"

Updated at 6:45 p.m. to include information from subsequent New York Times article.

Comments

1.

K.
Mar 13, 2009 3:52 PM CST

Yay!

The return of the rule of law.  About time.

Flag this comment

2.

J.D.
Mar 15, 2009 12:23 PM CST

Next, he’ll eliminate the word “terrorism” so that there won’t be any more terrorist attacks! Yay!

Liberals are dangerously dumb.

Flag this comment

3.

sam
Mar 16, 2009 6:55 AM CST

Why not just call them islamic terrorists?

Flag this comment

4.

Bankruptcy Babe
Mar 18, 2009 12:22 PM CST

Liberals are dangerously dumb?  No—people who think we should only fear terrorist attacks are dumb.  There is danger everwhere. America has handled dangererous people before and we’ll do it again.  AND we can do it without torture.  Criminals come from all walks of life and countries-even our own America.  Poor J.D. if he thinks he can put a face on evil then he’ll be safe.  What would he have done if he came face to face with the gunman who killed all the amish children in their schoolhouse? If the man wasn’t wearing a turbin, J.D. would have thought he was a good guy.  We have enemies all around us.  Have faith that America is smarter than them.  You invite danger when you think you can define evil to one race or cause.  It’s all around us. So yes, I think dropping “ememy combatant” is a good start.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.