Evidence
Oral Testimony May Be Obsolete in 15 Years, Top Judge Warns
Posted Oct 21, 2009 5:50 PM CST
By Martha Neil
A top judge in the United Kingdom is calling for courts to consider whether oral testimony is becoming obsolete as the younger generation increasingly relies on the Internet to communicate.
In 15 years, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales predicted this week, it may be necessary to present evidence by computer, in order to communicate with juries, reports the London Times.
“If a generation is going to arrive in the jury box that is totally unused to sitting and listening but is using technology to gain the information it needs to form a judgment, that changes the whole orality tradition with which we are familiar,” he said.
Related coverage:
ABAJournal.com: "UK’s High Court OKs Serving Injunction on Anonymous Blogger Via Twitter"
ABAJournal.com: "New Mich. Jury Rule: No Texts, Tweets or Google Searches"
Techdirt: "Australian Court Says Tweeting From Court Can Be A Good Thing"

Comments
Snarky Progressive
Oct 22, 2009 9:26 AM CST
A British judge’s opinion? Who cares? He’s not American, therefore it’s wholly irrelevant. (Just ask Scalia.) Why is the *American* Bar Journal bothering to report on this?
Flag this comment
progressive conservative
Oct 22, 2009 9:55 AM CST
and surely by the time this happens, everything on the internet will be true so a jury would be able to make a well informed/fair decision.
Flag this comment
tim
Oct 22, 2009 2:20 PM CST
Because a growing number of american judges think american law is not good enough so they trash the constitution and look to foreign laws and foreign judges for advice to pacify their hatred of the american white man rule of law.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Oct 23, 2009 1:16 AM CST
Man, oh man, Scoob. I hope they still eat American cheese.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.