Attorney General
Ousted US Atty: Firings ‘Devastating for DOJ’
Posted Oct 22, 2007 10:00 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Fired U.S. Attorney Carol Lam of San Diego told Stanford Lawyer in her first on-the-record interview since her dismissal that the Justice Department’s decision to oust nine federal prosecutors has created devastating uncertainty and demonstrated the failure of DOJ management.
The firings have sparked a public outcry and congressional hearings into whether politics motivated the action. A Stanford alum, Lam said in the Q-and-A article that the events show why the Justice Department and its prosecutors need to have independence.
“The assumption is that you will be allowed to remain in the position until the end of the term unless you make an egregious error," she said. "Ignoring that tradition has created a great problem for the Department of Justice, and failing to comprehend why that tradition was so important demonstrates the complete failure of DOJ management that led to this unfortunate state of affairs. The uncertainty it has caused among U.S. attorneys is just devastating for the DOJ. And it's still shocking to me that department leadership took such an ill-advised course, without thinking through the consequences.”
Lam said the phone call asking for her resignation came as a complete surprise. “There was no hint of what was coming, nothing in the air,” she said. “We had all been at a conference together earlier in the week and were told how great a job we were doing.”
Lam is pleased that the firings drew so much media attention. “Ironically, it renewed my faith in the country and in the public's ability to focus on important issues,” she said. “What this situation pointed out to me was that people are very concerned about the justice system. They're very concerned about either the perception or the reality that their justice system is not working in a fair and evenhanded manner.”
Some have speculated that Lam was fired for leading an investigation into former Republican congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who was sentenced in March 2006 to taking more than $2.4 million from defense contractors.
Since she was dismissed from her prosecutor post in February, Lam became acting general counsel of Qualcomm. She replaced Lou Lupin, who resigned after the company was accused of “litigation abuse” for failing to turn over discovery documents in a patent case.
Updated 10/22/07 at 12:51 p.m. CST to state that nine U.S. attorneys were ousted.

Comments
champ walker
Oct 23, 2007 9:13 PM CST
please read and share with you readers. This is a new development that the masses need to be aware of.
House investigates prosecution of former state Sen. Charles Walker
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/news/stories/2007/10/23/HOUSE_WALKER.html
By REBECCA CARR
http://harpers.org/archive/2007/10/hbc-90001450
Cox News Service
Published on: 10/23/07
Also read the Harpers Magazine article here:
Flag this comment
AC
Oct 26, 2007 8:15 AM CST
“The assumption is that you will be allowed to remain in the position until the end of the term unless you make an egregious error,” she said.
“Ignoring that tradition has created a great problem for the Department of Justice, and failing to comprehend why that tradition was so important demonstrates the complete failure of DOJ management that led to this unfortunate state of affairs.”
This is typical nonsense—we all work under a threat of losing our jobs at any time—
If we work at a firm, we risk the firm losing business…
If we work at a corporation, there’s outsourcing or less business…
If we work anywhere, there’s always the possibility that we’ll P*** off the wrong person..
If we’re solo practitioners, we risk losing clients.
Surely we all know this—or does politics get in the way of reason for even supposedly sophisticated professionals?
To give this lady’s whining validation by printing in a publication intended for intelligent people is somewhat insulting.
We all know this is how it works—Clinton taught us all the way.
Flag this comment
Robert Gorman
Oct 26, 2007 9:55 AM CST
AC completely misses the point by comparing private employment situations with government employment. These appointees are not George Bush’s employees. They are our employees, democrats, republicans and independents. They were discharged because they would not serve partisan purposes. If they refuse to perform and uphold the law, they should be discharged. If they are discharged because they refuse to fulfill the goals and objectives of a political party, they should be applauded.
Flag this comment
Thomas Ewbank
Oct 26, 2007 11:24 AM CST
Any expectation of serving one’s full term as Ms. Tam said she had should have been destroyed when Bill Clinton fired all 90 US Attorneys at the beginning of his term without cause or excuse. If firing six destroyed DOJ morale, it must have been a megaton explosion in 1993.
Flag this comment
E. Hartenstine
Oct 26, 2007 1:02 PM CST
I’m puzzled. Why wasn’t it devastating when
BILL fired many U.S. Attorneys in his administration?
Flag this comment
Darl Gleed
Oct 26, 2007 1:30 PM CST
People expect changeover when a new administration comes in. Unexpected firings with no warning is the problem, most with a hint of potical motivation. The Patriot Act would have given Gonzales unfettered ability on his own to replace the attorneys, although he denied he was going to do that. Power is the issue here.
Flag this comment
Kathman
Nov 3, 2007 5:54 AM CST
Gorman misses the point. These are not government employees under the civil service system. They are political appointees. Their employment is subject to the whims and decisions of the President. They know that when they are appointed.
If what Bush did was so wrong, why didn’t the media jump on Clinton when he fired EVERY SINGLE US Attorney during his administration? Why? Because Clinton had that right. Why are they making a big deal out of Bush firing A FEW? Because the Democratics have nothing better to do than blow smoke at the Bush Administration. Had they spent more time and effort in defending our country in the 1990s, 9-1-1 would never have happened and we would not be at war now. Stop blaming the Republicans for what the Democrats caused. We’re just trying to clean up the mess the Democrats made.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.