Legal Ethics
‘Pants Suit’ Judge Back in Court, Now Suing for Job and $1 Million
Posted May 6, 2008 5:51 PM CST
By Martha Neil
A former administrative law judge in Washington, D.C., who infamously filed suit against his dry cleaner for $67 million (he later reduced his claim to $54 million) is back in court again.
Now Roy Pearson is seeking reinstatement to the job he may have lost, at least in part, as a result of his notorious "pants suit" claiming the dry cleaner lost his trousers. He is also claiming at least $1 million in compensatory and punitive damages in the federal court job action, the Associated Press and the Examiner report.
"Pearson said in court documents that he was protected as a whistle-blower and that the city was using the fact that he was being 'vilified in the media' to cut him out of his $100,000 job," the Examiner writes.
Explains CNN, in an earlier article about the federal suit, "Pearson, again acting as his own attorney, relies on what he considers Washington's 'Whistle-blower Protection' law to try to establish illegal retaliation." Pearson's latest suit was filed May 1 in federal district court in Washington, D.C., according to CNN.
Related coverage:
DCist: "Roy Pearson Sues for $1 Million and His Job Back"
ABAJournal.com: "It’s Confirmed: Judge Who Sued Over Lost Pants Lost His Job"
ABAJournal.com: "$54M Pants Suit Takes Judge to the Cleaners"
ABAJournal.com: "Judge Knocks Pants Suit"
Hat tip: How Appealing.

Comments
Dan
May 9, 2008 6:42 AM CST
And we wonder why there is so little respect for the legal profession…
Flag this comment
JAF
May 9, 2008 8:00 AM CST
This guy is OFF HIS ROCKER! Oh how I wish we had a way to really punish people who bring the type of suit that doesn’t pass the old-fashioned smell test.
Flag this comment
Jen
May 9, 2008 8:03 AM CST
Administrative Judge? Most states don’t require a law license. I wouldn’t be suprised if he never went to law school and knows just enough law to make him dangerous.
Flag this comment
Jim
May 9, 2008 8:15 AM CST
Jen,
I thought the same thing, but he apparently went to Northwestern
Flag this comment
Heather
May 9, 2008 9:41 AM CST
Northwestern?! It’s a sad day for my alma mater :o(
Flag this comment
R
May 9, 2008 10:15 AM CST
He’s going to lose his pants. Twice.
Flag this comment
dts
May 9, 2008 12:52 PM CST
Whistle blower? On whom did he blow the whistle? More like “Hornblower’
Flag this comment
Rob
May 9, 2008 3:47 PM CST
Sadly, this is not that far off of many lawsuits that are filed every day. A good strategy for a paid vacation is to engage in outrageous behavior, then complain when you’re fired. This works especially well when the conduct was not during work hours. One would hope that with judges, even administrative judges, personal actions that demonstrate a complete lack of judgment would be sufficient to justify not allowing the judge to stay on the bench.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.