• Home
  • News
  • Paralegal Accused of Stealing From Pa. Law Firm to Repay NYC Law Firm

Criminal Justice

Paralegal Accused of Stealing From Pa. Law Firm to Repay NYC Law Firm

Posted May 18, 2009 4:23 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Awaiting sentencing for stealing $285,000 from a New York City law firm, a paralegal allegedly stole from her new employer—a law firm in Norristown, Pa.—to pay restitution to her former employer.

Kathy Foer-Morse is now facing new charges, including theft and forgery, in Pennsylvania, where she is accused of writing 12 checks to transfer more than $100,000 from High Swartz to her personal bank account, reports CBS3.

Montgomery County, Pa., authorities investigating the High Swartz theft checked Foer-Morse's bank records and say that she used money stolen from the Pennsylvania firm to pay restitution in her New York City case.

The Mercury identifies the New York City law firm for which Foer-Morse formerly worked as Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke.

Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman said in a press release that Foer-Morse began working in the estates department of High Swartz in July 2008, the Mercury reports. She was terminated May 1 "due to problems with her work performance and attitude," the release states.

A report by KYW Newsradio 1060 gives a slightly different account of how the 49-year-old Foer Morse became the focus of a Pennsylvania criminal case:

"The partner in the law firm was going through the accounts and realized that there was money missing. They did an accounting of it and the defendant was found to have been involved in previous theft from another law firm, and she was arrested," first assistant district attorney Kevin Steele tells the station.

The defendant allegedly took about $50,000 from two different estate accounts, for a total take of about $100,000, Steele says.

None of the articles includes any comment from Foer-Morse, who is being held in lieu of $99,000 bail.

Subsequent coverage:

ABAJournal.com: "Pa. Law Firm is Sadder But Wiser After Alleged Thefts By Paralegal"

Last updated on May 19 to include link to subsequent ABAJournal.com post.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
May 18, 2009 11:58 PM CST

Amazing how often firms read the resumes and conduct the interviews, then hire without reference checks, then put the employee in a position handling firm and/or client funds.  The whole “ounce of prevention” thing is too often overlooked.

Flag this comment

2.

DB
May 19, 2009 5:57 AM CST

This is a classical case of robbing Peter to Pay Paul.  Where is our biblical sense of right and wrong?  Shouldn’t this person be punished?

Flag this comment

3.

HA
May 19, 2009 8:40 AM CST

This is absolutly amazing. This is why people should do background checks and reference checks before hiring. I work for an attorney in Kentucky and I could never imagine ever stealing from him or our clients for that matter. This is absurd!!!

Flag this comment

4.

Old Lawyer
May 19, 2009 10:14 AM CST

Just try making a background check call and see if you can obtain any useful information - especially if the information is unfavorable.

Flag this comment

5.

B. McLeod
May 19, 2009 12:27 PM CST

One of the many uses of the magic computer (especially if the information is a conviction).  It is still worth making the calls too, because sometimes you can get something useful.  Sometimes, the call exposes the reference as fictitious.

Flag this comment

6.

Chris
May 19, 2009 2:04 PM CST

To #4,
I agree it’s amazing how many people think they’re on the hook for defamation or something like it if they give negative information.  My state has a shield law that protects an employer for even the negligent release of unfavorable information about a prior employee.  Most companies won’t bother with the hassle.

Flag this comment

7.

Angila
May 26, 2009 10:17 PM CST

I am a current paralegal student. We are currently studying ethics. I feel this is a clear reason that ethics should and do pertain to paralegals as well as attorney.
I personally feel that an employer in the legal field as well as other occupations should have the right to do a thorough background check. This is just a very good example of one reason this should be done.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.