Partners
PI Lawyer Claims ‘Hypocritical’ Personal Spending by Politically Connected Ex-Boss
Posted Aug 21, 2009 10:09 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Miami personal injury lawyer John Leighton has sued the politically connected lawyer who hired him straight out of law school nearly 25 years ago in a battle over law firm finances and management.
The dispute “is sure to go down as one of the ugliest law firm breakups in South Florida,” the Daily Business Review (reg. req.) reports. The defendant is Ira Leesfield, who served as Florida finance co-chair for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Leighton claims he had a 19 percent stake in a law firm primarily owned by Leesfield, but Leesfield refused to give him access to firm financial data and even installed computer spyware to make sure no one looked at the information, according to the story.
But Leighton was able to review financial records that were not locked away, the suit alleges, and discovered the law firm had funded “personal and other secret expenses.”
The suit claims Leesfield used law firm resources and finances to help Hillary Clinton’s campaign and to pay personal bills, including the tab for meals, Broadway shows, birthday parties and vacations. Leighton is seeking access to additional financial records, $250,000 for his share of the firm, and other damages, according to the story.
“The revelation of the excessive spending—particularly in the face of Leesfield’s constant lectures … about using the law firm’s resources for personal matters—was astounding, hypocritical and very disappointing,” the suit says.
A lawyer for Leesfield, Andrew Hall, told the Daily Business Review that Leighton filed the suit after being fired for secretly downloading 15,000 documents. He said Leighton was looking at the information in preparation for forming his own law firm. Leighton now practices in his own firm called Leighton Law.
For his part, Leesfield told the publication he is “very hurt” by the suit. “No good deed goes unpunished,” Leesfield said. “I paid him $2 million one year. My daughter baby-sat for him. I think John has gone astray due to greed and personal envy.”
The suit (PDF posted by the Daily Business Review) was filed Wednesday in Miami Dade circuit court.

Comments
B. McLeod
Aug 21, 2009 10:55 AM CST
This will probably suffice to draw the attention of a few IRS field auditors.
Flag this comment
LAW
Aug 21, 2009 2:58 PM CST
A sketchy PI attorney .... what a shocker
Flag this comment
CiaoLawSchool!
Aug 21, 2009 8:25 PM CST
LAW, check the stats on disbarments and discipline. Then make your assinine, kneejerk comment if you have data to back it up. You don’t have the ‘nads to get in front of a jury with $100K+ of your own money invested in the case.
Flag this comment
Ernest
Aug 21, 2009 8:58 PM CST
Go Ira! You are right about young John being consumed by personal greed and envy. Not long ago, I watched him steal a client from a much more ethical lawyer after parachuting in (uninvited) from Leesfield’s jet. The settlement he got in the case was a fraction of what the ethical lawyer would have gotten—but Leighton compromised the client’s recovery for an appearance with Katie Couric on the Today Show.
Mr. Leighton is a member of that part of the Bar that makes the upper 99% possible. A thief indeed, Ira. Good luck in your defense.
Flag this comment
Mike Rosenthal
Aug 24, 2009 8:56 AM CST
Ernest has an interesting view of life. He refers to John Leighton, who just turned 50, as “young John”. Then he critcizes Leighton for flying in using Leesfield’s jet and “stealing” a client - guess the fact that Leighton was working for Ira’s firm, which Ira clearly controlled, is not relevant to Ernest. This event occurred 2 years before Leighton left Leesfield. Oh, and the last time I checked, the ethical rules in every state provide that the client, not the prospective or current counsel, gets to choose who represents her. I don’t know enough about the case to know whether the settlement was a good one or a bad one, but I do know that until I have all the facts in hand and have litigated the case to the point of settlement, I am not in a position to judge the case’s value. Apparently Ernest, who did not litigate the case, is able to judge it’s value from a distance.
I’ve known John Leighton for over 30 years, he is a straight arrow - as ethical, honest and zealous an advocate as you can find. I’ve watched him litigate one case tirelessly in the face of enormous odds, knowing it was unlikely he’d recover anything, because he committed to do so. I have the utmost respect for John.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.