Law Firms
Recruiter Loses Appeal in Fee Suit Against Blank Rome
Posted Mar 25, 2009 7:08 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
A New York appeals court has ruled e-mails exchanged between a legal recruiter and Blank Rome were not an enforceable contract requiring the law firm to pay a recruiting fee of $730,000.
The recruiter Mark Bruce International Inc. had claimed Blank Rome should pay the money in connection with the law firm's merger with Healy & Baillie, a 28-lawyer maritime firm in New York, the New York Law Journal reports.
The appeals court opinion said the "exchange of e-mails, which did not set forth the fee for plaintiff's services or an objective standard to determine it, was too indefinite to be enforceable."
A Mark Bruce recruiter had suggested the merger 10 months before its fruition. Blank Rome later merged with the smaller firm with the help of a different recruiter, which got the $730,000 fee sought by Mark Bruce.

Comments
B. McLeod
Mar 25, 2009 7:31 AM CST
Well, this Bruce guy should have made sure.
Flag this comment
JN
Mar 25, 2009 10:30 AM CST
I heart due diligence.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Mar 25, 2009 11:44 AM CST
A Comyn oversight.
Flag this comment
stung before
Mar 26, 2009 7:14 AM CST
Always get it in writing.
Flag this comment
MJK
Mar 26, 2009 9:41 AM CST
What the posting fails to mention is that merger discussions were had between Lawrence Mullman a partner at Major Lindsey and his brother Michael Mullman the head of Blank Rome’s New York office. Conflict of interest? Or just bad luck for Mark Bruce?
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.