Constitutional Law

Sheriff Arpaio's Pink-Underwear Policy May Violate Rights of Unconvicted Inmates, 9th Circuit Says


A nationally known Arizona sheriff’s requirement that inmates at his jail don pink underwear could be unconstitutional, as far as those not yet convicted of a crime are concerned, a federal appeals court says.

But the comment in a written opinion by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals doesn’t have the force of law, because the pink-underwear issue wasn’t raised on appeal, Reuters reports.

“Unexplained and undefended, the dress-out in pink appears to be punishment without legal justification,” said the majority of a three-judge panel in its written opinion concerning another Maricopa County matter.

And, while inmates’ pink underwear is not a topic on which the 9th Circuit can presently offer a decisive ruling, “it appears to us that this question is still open for exploration at trial on remand,” the majority notes.

Previous:
Whether or Not the Biggest in Calif. History, $8.9M Worker's Comp Settlement Is 'Pretty Darn Large'

Next:
Deputies Shoot and Wound Barefoot Man Firing Gun Outside Tulsa Courthouse


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.