Legal Ethics

Some lawyer puffery in settlement negotiations is allowed, proposed California ethics opinion says


A lawyer negotiating on behalf of a client in settlement talks may engage in some “puffery” in regards to the client’s goals or willingness to compromise, according to a proposed ethics opinion by the ethics committee of the California State Bar.

A lawyer’s false statements of material fact, however, would violate ethics rules that bar a lawyer from engaging in deceit, the proposed ethics opinion (PDF) says. That means a lawyer can’t falsely claim there is a favorable eyewitness, for example, and can’t make false statements about insurance policy limits. The ABA/BNA Lawyers’ Manual on Professional Conduct has the story.

The opinion is consistent with ABA Formal Op. 06-439, though the ABA opinion is based on a model ethics rule that has not been adopted in California. The rule bars lawyers from making false statements of material fact or law to a third person, and bars lawyers from failing to disclose a material fact when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a client’s criminal or fraudulent act.

Previous:
28 attorneys general ask five retailers to drop tobacco products

Next:
Attorney pleads guilty, says he bribed judge for favorable case rulings


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.