• Home
  • News
  • Sotomayor’s ‘Provocative Comment’ Questioned Corporate Law Foundations

U.S. Supreme Court

Sotomayor’s ‘Provocative Comment’ Questioned Corporate Law Foundations

Posted Sep 17, 2009 7:09 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A comment by the U.S. Supreme Court’s newest justice last week questioned precedent dating to the 19th century that gave corporations constitutional rights.

The Wall Street Journal has the story. “In her maiden Supreme Court appearance last week, Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a provocative comment that probed the foundations of corporate law,” the newspaper reports.

Sotomayor spoke during arguments on a First Amendment challenge to campaign finance restrictions barring broadcast of “electioneering communications” by corporations in the days before elections.

Judges "created corporations as persons, gave birth to corporations as persons," she said. "There could be an argument made that that was the court's error to start with... [imbuing] a creature of state law with human characteristics."

The story cited an 1886 tax case in which attorneys were informed by the chief justice that they could skip arguments on whether the equal protection clause applied to corporations because "we are all of opinion that it does." Opinions that followed expanded corporate rights, although confusion remains over protection for corporations, the story says.

In the current case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, corporate rights are likely to prevail. News stories published after the oral arguments said the court appeared ready to strike down or curtail the restrictions on corporate campaign spending.

Comments

1.

AndytheLawyer
Sep 17, 2009 9:28 AM CST

Not a bad idea in the realm of political contributions—If you can’t vote, you can’t contribute.

Of course, we then can expect bills introduced by Republicans in Congress to grant corporations the vote.

Flag this comment

2.

London Calling
Sep 17, 2009 12:20 PM CST

And we can expect Democrats in Congress to be lacking the spine to effectively oppose any such bills.

Flag this comment

3.

Chris
Sep 18, 2009 1:42 PM CST

There’s no way that corporations should be treated like people. They have no morals, for one thing, because of the limited liability of their shareholders. For another, they have unlimited financial and media-controlling power. Treating them exactly like individuals is like suggesting two-year olds should be treated as adults.

Flag this comment

4.

Joe Burgess
Sep 23, 2009 10:28 PM CST

Sotomayor is following in the large and distinguished footsteps of Hugo Black.

Go to http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=303&invol=77 and scroll down to Black’s sensible dissenting opinion in CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS. CO. v. JOHNSON, Treasurer of State of California.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.