• Home
  • News
  • Stanford Law Grad Avoids Prison in Escort Service Tax Evasion Case

Criminal Justice

Stanford Law Grad Avoids Prison in Escort Service Tax Evasion Case

Posted Jan 27, 2009 2:51 PM CST
By Martha Neil

A Stanford Law School graduate who reportedly pursued a lucrative nonlegal (and illegal) career to help cover the cost of her student loans has avoided prison but will serve a year of home detention for tax evasion under a plea agreement.

The agreement, which was filed yesterday in federal court in San Jose, Calif., also calls for Cristina Warthen, 35, to pay the government $313,000 and serve three years of probation, reports the San Jose Mercury News.

She faced a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $100,000 fine, reports the San Francisco Chronicle. However, the $313,133.74 she agreed to pay to the U.S. Treasury amounted to the total she earned from the escort service. The federal income tax she owed totaled $24,424.

As detailed in an earlier ABAJournal.com post, the case concerns unpaid taxes on Warthen's cash earnings running an escort service while working as a prostitute under the name "Brazil."

She was not charged with prostitution; "this is a case where she had illegal income and she didn't report it," Special Agent Arlette Lee of the Internal Revenue Service criminal investigation division tells the Chronicle. "If she reported it properly, she probably wouldn't have been looking at a tax charge."

Comments

1.

Allen Sheketovits
Jan 28, 2009 7:51 AM CST

This one is a Stanford Law graduate, no?  And a looker, no less.  I do not understand why someone who is a Stanford graduate, and a looker has to turn into a hooker?  What is this world coming to?  I also remember she married some internet wonk.  He probably is happy to have her one a one year home detention.  Plenty of time for indoor activity with her.  Oy!

Flag this comment

2.

Peter
Jan 28, 2009 12:51 PM CST

Why are all the top 10 law school students turning out to be hookers, swindlers, con men, ponzi artists, etc?

Flag this comment

3.

Paul the Magyar
Jan 28, 2009 6:44 PM CST

First, this story is written in such a way as to suggest that prostitution is a bad thing. 
Second, she is not a looker.  Web searches reveal a person who may have cultivated a deliberately skanky look for marketing purposes but who is definitely NOT attractive in any case.
Third, Law School can teach one codes of ethics, but cannot teach ethics.  One comes to Law School with or without ethics and leaves pretty much the same way.  Law Schools may not be able to screen for ethics, but bars do.

Flag this comment

4.

B. McLeod
Jan 28, 2009 7:22 PM CST

I suppose we can expect another 150 some posts blaming her law school for leading her to believe she could expect to repay those loans without working the streets.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.