• Home
  • News
  • Stop Dealing Or We’ll Prosecute, Officials Tell 12 Alleged Seattle Drug-Pushers

Criminal Justice

Stop Dealing Or We’ll Prosecute, Officials Tell 12 Alleged Seattle Drug-Pushers

Posted Aug 7, 2009 2:36 PM CST
By Martha Neil

In a unique law enforcement effort that's reportedly never been tried before in the state of Washington, Seattle officials invited a dozen alleged drug-dealers to meet with them last night and see the evidence that's been put together in a year-long undercover operation.

If the dealers agree to stop dealing, authorities will help them turn their lives around and obtain education, job-training and substance-abuse treatment. If they are caught dealing again in King County, however, they will be prosecuted, reports the Seattle Times.

"We've done sweeps, we've done undercover buys and crackdowns and we're still not getting a handle on drug dealing in our neighborhoods," says John Diaz, the city's interim police chief. "We're trying to change the culture and the norms in the neighborhood."

A similar program tried in 2004 in High Point, N.C., with the help of professor David Kennedy of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice has decimated public drug-dealing. At the same time, violent crime has gone down by 20 percent in the city, the college's website reports.

Comments

1.

LS
Aug 7, 2009 5:05 PM CST

I applaud the effort and would think this program has potential. Considering the difficulty of rehabilitating convicted offenders, felons especially, these guys will get a meaningful second chance - many of them potentially a first. Unfortunately, an idea like this is virtually unthinkable in a vast number of states around the country.

2.

Anonymous
Aug 8, 2009 8:55 PM CST

This sure strikes me as odd and it raises many questions.  If the same officials prosecute other offenders without giving them a freebie first, is that selective prosecution?  Does this mean we’ve decided that “drug pushing” is a victimless crime?  Or did we give up on justice for the people and families affected by the drug dealers’ actions?

3.

Jim | 2009-08-10-Mo 2244 -0400
Aug 10, 2009 8:46 PM CST

I’ll go with #1 LS.

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.