• Home
  • News
  • Suit Alleges Madoff Culture of Drugs and ‘Sexual Deviance’

Trials & Litigation

Suit Alleges Madoff Culture of Drugs and ‘Sexual Deviance’

Posted Oct 21, 2009 5:46 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Cocaine was so prevalent in Bernard Madoff’s office that it was once called the North Pole, according to an expanded lawsuit that alleges a culture of “sexual deviance” and drug use.

The suit filed by plaintiffs lawyer Joseph Cotchett paints a stark contrast between Madoff’s former life and his new routine in prison where he sleeps on the bottom bunk and eats pizza cooked by a child molester, the Los Angeles Times reports. Stories also ran in ABC News, the Associated Press and the New York Post.

"Rather than spending time on private planes or his yachts," Madoff "now shares a cell with a 21-year-old inmate convicted of drug crimes," the complaint says, according to the New York Post account.

Madoff’s prison buddies are former mob boss Carmine Persico and Jonathan Pollard, who was convicted of spying for Israel, the suit says.

The expanded suit adds several defendants, including accounting firm KPMG, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon, according to Reuters. A law firm statement alleged KPMG failed to catch red flags while auditing feeder funds, JPMorgan Chase helped launder Madoff money, and JPMorgan and Bank of New York Mellon failed to file suspicious activity reports about money transfers to London.

The suit describes "wild office parties sans spouses" with topless waitresses, and employees’ sexual encounters on "their boss' sofa." Some of the “feeders” who channeled investor money to Madoff participated in the parties, according to the complaint.

"Madoff's affinity for escorts, masseuses and attractive female employees was well known in the office culture," the complaint says. "A significant amount of the money stolen from investors went towards these lavish indulgences as well as other expenses for his employees, family and favorite feeders."

Madoff revealed details of his Ponzi scheme in a prison interview with Cotchett last July.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Oct 21, 2009 6:29 AM CST

Was Cotchett writing a complaint or a screenplay?

Flag this comment

2.

vudublu
Oct 21, 2009 6:54 AM CST

I don’t think that distinction still exists.

Flag this comment

3.

Michael
Oct 21, 2009 10:16 AM CST

Even in Manhattan I think it’s probably impossible to spend $80B on hookers and drugs.  The info is deliciously prejudicial but given Madoff’s background I have to think that there’s lots more substance to focus on when filing lawsuits.

Flag this comment

4.

Ronbo
Oct 21, 2009 2:25 PM CST

If the payments for some of these, ahem, services show up on the books, Picard can try to recover the funds.  Gives new meaning to the term “claw back”.

Flag this comment

5.

Olga Boatski
Oct 23, 2009 6:36 AM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

Flag this comment

6.

GTL
Oct 23, 2009 8:22 AM CST

What is this lawsuit for and how are sex, drugs and negligence all connected to the same case? Oh, now I remember—the sex and drugs are only there to get the press interested in your case so it can be tried in the media rather than in a court room. It probably even gets you on TV.  I am so embarrassed for my profession sometimes.

Flag this comment

7.

robert
Oct 23, 2009 11:54 AM CST

At Madoff’s age, drug use is to be expected, and ANY sex would be “deviant,” in my opinion.

Flag this comment

8.

Sac
Oct 23, 2009 7:29 PM CST

#6 (GTL) - I’m confused why you’d be so embarrassed for prosecutors to add drug and sex-crime charges, and related conspiracies, in a federal CRIMINAL lawsuit (which is what I presume they did in “expanding” the suit).  I’m proud of my profession, and Bernie, for what he did, deserves to have his dirty laundry aired, IMHO.  He deserves to be next to a drug offender in prison; he is a drug offender.

Flag this comment

9.

KNS
Oct 26, 2009 10:50 AM CST

#8 (Sac) - I think you may have misread the article because, unless I’m mistaken, “plaintiff’s attorney” does not refer to a criminal prosecutor.  It refers to the civil attorney representing the fraud victims who are suing Madoff (and the other companies listed) to recover the money they “invested” with Madoff. 

That being said, I agree with you that Madoff’s sex and drug escapades are relevant to the lawsuit, if that’s what Madoff spent the money he swindled out of his victims on.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.