Supreme Court to Consider ‘Pay for Delay’ Deals Keeping Generic Drugs Off the Market
Posted Dec 11, 2012 5:29 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether so-called pay for delay settlements that temporarily keep generic competitors out of the market are lawful in patent litigation.
The case before the court involves payments made by Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc., now owned by Abbott Laboratories, that delayed generic versions of its testosterone treatment Androgel, Bloomberg News, Reuters and the New York Times report. The Federal Trade Commission argues in its cert petition (PDF) that such payments are presumptively anticompetitive and unlawful. The court granted cert Friday.
In “pay for delay” cases, brand-name drug companies pay a would-be generic competitor to drop a challenge of the brand-name patent and to keep the generic version of the drug off the market for a specified time period.
The FTC maintains that such arrangements cost consumers $3.5 billion a year.
Three federal appeals courts have upheld pay-for-delay deals, but the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found such payments were anticompetitive in a July opinion, the Times says. In the case before the court, the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld such a deal.
The case is Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc.