U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court to Decide if Sullivan & Cromwell’s Mailroom Mix-Up Bars Capital Appeal

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a mailroom mix-up at Sullivan & Cromwell that resulted in a missed deadline bars the habeas appeal of a death row inmate.

The court granted cert today in Maples v. Allen, the Associated Press reports. Former Solicitor General Gregory Garre of Latham & Watkins filed the cert petition (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog).

At issue is whether Cory Maples can file a habeas appeal alleging ineffective assistance of counsel even though Sullivan & Cromwell failed to appeal an adverse ruling within the 42-day deadline.

The law firm’s error was set in motion after two associates representing Maples pro bono left Sullivan & Cromwell. An Alabama court sent the firm copies of a ruling denying post-conviction relief, but addressed the correspondence to the departed lawyers.

The mailroom returned the unopened mail to the court clerk along with a note, “Return to Sender—Left Firm.”

Onetime ICE Lawyer Gets 17 Years for Taking Bribes

Deposition Gets Sidetracked in Lengthy Detour over the Meaning of Photocopiers

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.