U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court to Weigh Huge Class Action in Wal-Mart Sex Bias Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether up to 1.5 million former and current employees of Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club can bring their claims in a class action lawsuit.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari today, according to How Appealing and SCOTUSblog. The plaintiffs contend Wal-Mart was biased against women in pay and promotions throughout its 3,400 stores.

“The stakes are huge,” according to a New York Times preview of the case. “If the Supreme Court allows the suit to proceed as a class action, that could easily cost Wal-Mart $1 billion or more in damages, legal experts say.”

The Los Angeles Times says the case, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, is the largest job bias lawsuit in the nation’s history. The lead plaintiff, Betty Dukes, is a Walmart greeter. When the suit was filed, she earned $8.44 an hour, despite nine years of work at the store. Within a year, she saw her pay increased by almost 50 percent.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the class action in April in a 6-5 vote.

Briefs in the case cited the work of the Supreme Court’s newest justices, the New York Times reports in its story on the cert grant. Wal-Mart noted an unsigned student note on class certification written by Justice Elena Kagan. The bias plaintiffs cited a previous ruling by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, issued as a federal appeals judge, allowing an even larger antitrust class action. One of the plaintiffs was Wal-Mart.

Justice Thomas’ Wife Says Call to Anita Hill Was ‘Probably a Mistake’

Supreme Court to Consider Whether Utilities Can Be Sued in Tort for Global Warming

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.