Tax Law
Tax Court Rejects Gay Man’s Attempt to File Joint Married Return
Posted Jul 14, 2009 12:01 PM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The U.S. Tax Court has ruled that a gay activist is not entitled to file a married joint return with his partner.
The court said in its opinion (PDF) that petitioner Charles Merrill, an artist and millionaire, is not entitled to married filing joint status because he never filed a tax return for the tax years in question, 2004 and 2005. The court did not reach Merrill’s constitutional arguments.
One claim, outlined by TaxProf Blog, was that the Defense of Marriage Act had barred Merrill from getting the same benefits as other married couples, violating the First Amendment’s establishment clause. He also had alleged a constitutional violation in discriminatory sections of the Internal Revenue Code.
Merrill’s cousin is the founder of Merrill Lynch, according to the opinion. For 23 years he was married to Evangeline Johnson Merrill, an heiress to Johnson & Johnson Co., but he became involved in a relationship with Kevin Boyle shortly after her death. During the tax years in question, Merrill and Boyle had not yet gotten married, although they had participated in a commitment ceremony. They married in 2008 and have been together 18 years.
Merrill did not file tax returns for either 2004 or 2005, despite owing more than $835,000 in taxes, according to the Internal Revenue Service. He later told the IRS that he didn’t pay taxes as an act of civil disobedience advocating same-sex marriage equality. The court disagreed. “DOMA has no bearing on petitioner's filing status, and its constitutionality is irrelevant to our holding,” the opinion said in a footnote.

Comments
Time
Jul 14, 2009 12:21 PM CST
DOMA is an abomination and must go, but this tax cheat is not the person to help make that happen.
Flag this comment
T.R.
Jul 14, 2009 12:56 PM CST
Oh I fully expect that the IRS et al will see more and more of these, particularly as more states grant same-sex marriage rights.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Jul 14, 2009 1:33 PM CST
Interesting. If I recall the rule correctly, absent contrary stipulation, one of the two dockets is appealable to the 4th Circuit and the other to the 9th (controlled by Taxpayer residence as of date of Tax Court Petition). Taxpayer’s argument is a bit lame, given the absence of any putative “marriage” in either period, and the absence of a filed return in either period. But hey, the 9th Circuit!! There could be a (probably hoped-for) split, positioning the case for a cert. request.
Flag this comment
Jason
Jul 14, 2009 2:09 PM CST
Why isn’t this piece of trash not in jail for not paying his taxes? Being gay isn’t the story. It is Charles Merrill rich elitist attitude that he doesn’t have to pay taxes that should be the lead story.
I guess if you are liberal and rich you don’t have to pay taxes in America.
I hope his local hometown paper runs stories on this every day and villifies him until he pays up.
Flag this comment
Bean Counter
Jul 14, 2009 5:48 PM CST
In reply to #4, mmm… Joe the plumber does not pay taxes either, so if you are poor and conservative, you don’t have to pay taxes in America.
The point is whether poor or rich, left or right, some people just don’t like to pay taxes, period.
Also, it is very easy to catch non-flier with substantial assets (folks, Form 1099 exists for a reason), so they will have to pay taxes plus some hefty penalty.
Flag this comment
Jason
Jul 15, 2009 5:09 AM CST
#5 - Joe the bean counter should go to jail too - everyone who doesn’t pay their taxes should be hit with a felony on their record.
They need to make the penalties more serve, Make it a felony if it is the 2nd time you fail tp pay (first time u go with a fine) and also jail time for 3rd time.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.