Criminal Justice
Top Texas Judge Faces Ethics Case Over Late Filing Refused on Inmate’s Execution Day
Posted Feb 19, 2009 5:17 PM CST
By Martha Neil
The State Commission on Judicial Conduct filed an ethics complaint today against the presiding judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals concerning her controversial refusal to accept a late filing in a death penalty case on the day of the inmate's scheduled execution.
The commission's complaint (PDF) against Judge Sharon Keller, the state's top criminal court judge, alleges that her "willful and persistent failure" to follow the court's execution-day procedures on Sept. 25, 2007 "constitutes incompetence in the performance of duties of office,” reports the Austin American-Statesman in the newspaper's Austin Legal blog.
The inmate on whose behalf the appeal was attempted, Michael Wayne Richard, was executed at approximately 8:20 p.m., a little over three hours after a court official, at Keller's direction, told his counsel that the clerk's office would not stay open approximately 20 minutes after its usual closing time to accept a late filing in his case, according to the commission.
Specifically, Keller violated execution-day procedures by not referring the late-filing request to the designated judge in charge of Richard's execution, the complaint contends.
"In addition, Judge Keller knew that it had been common in the past to receive late pleadings on execution days after the clerk's office closed, and she knew that the execution-day procedures called for the designated judge to remain available after hours to receive last-minute communications regarding the scheduled execution," it continues.
In Richard's case, too, Keller knew at the time she directed the clerk's office to close at its usual time, that the appeal planned by his counsel was based on the U.S. Supreme Court's grant of certiorari that morning, in Baze v. Rees, the complaint states. That case contended that the lethal injection method used in Kentucky constituted cruel and unusual punishment; Texas also executes inmates by lethal injection.
Keller referred the newspaper's request for comment to her lawyer, Chip Babcock of Dallas, who did not immediately return its phone call.
Additional coverage:
Associated Press: "Texas judge charged with blocking execution appeal"
ABAJournal.com: "Storm Brews Over TX Judge Who Refused Late Capital Appeal"

Comments
B. McLeod
Feb 19, 2009 6:25 PM CST
We can only hope the late appellant who was the subject of this late appeal will not turn out in later years to have been yet another innocent person erroneously convicted by the Texas courts.
Flag this comment
W. Fricke
Feb 19, 2009 11:14 PM CST
What do 8th Amendment claims have to do with innocence? Late, late, later or not? A judge succumbing to the influence of exasperation is another matter.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Feb 20, 2009 12:24 AM CST
Nothing. But the fact that the appeal was not over the substantive conviction does not mean the conviction could not have been mistaken. A number of DNA-based vacations have followed jury verdicts that were not challenged or not overturned on appeal.
Flag this comment
Bill Dugan
Feb 20, 2009 1:35 AM CST
I disagree. If a judge is late, a person’s life or liberty is at stake. If a woman is late, the worst thing that can happen is you get a baby.
Flag this comment
tom
Feb 20, 2009 7:45 AM CST
In Conn that guy got suspended for 30 days for missing a deadline. Lets see if this judge gets suspended for 30 days or if there is a double standard.
Flag this comment
Glenn Pruden
Feb 20, 2009 10:49 AM CST
Too bad such scrutiny only applies when a judge appears to cross the line in allowing an execution to go forward. See http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/opinions/tsc/CapCases/Alley/Alley.shtml
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.