Supreme Court Nominations
What Alberto Gonzales Would Like to Ask Judge Sotomayor
Posted Jul 13, 2009 7:25 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has a few questions he would like to ask U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. And one of them concerns the war on terrorism.
Gonzales, whose Justice Department gave legal approval for harsh interrogation techniques of terrorism suspects, writes in the New York Times that he would ask this question: “Some overseas critics have questioned the legality of United States government policies on the war on terrorism. Should America’s standing in the world, to the extent it may be affected by the outcome of a case, ever inform a judicial decision?”
Sotomayor is scheduled to give an opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee today as it begins hearings on her nomination to replace retired justice David H. Souter. The New York Times asked several legal experts for questions they would like to ask Sotomayor. She would be the first Hispanic justice; Gonzales was the first Hispanic attorney general.
Gonzales would also ask Sotomayor whether, in light of her remarks about showing compassion, there is a difference between doing justice and applying the law. He would also ask Sotomayor when she would be willing to overturn precedent.
Here are a few of the questions submitted by other experts:
University of Wisconsin law professor Ann Althouse: “When you said you hoped that ‘a wise Latina’ would make better judicial decisions, did you mean it as a pleasantry aimed at people who had invited you to speak about diversity or will you now defend the idea that decision-making on the Supreme Court is enhanced by an array of justices representing different backgrounds?”
Stanford law professor Kathleen Sullivan: “Advocacy of ‘states’ rights’ has long been considered a hallmark of conservative judicial philosophy. Recently, however, we have seen the advent of what might be called ‘blue states’ rights,’ as progressive states seek to provide greater consumer, environmental and antidiscrimination protection than the federal government, while business seeks to strike down such measures as pre-empted by federal law. What is your view of the role of federalism in our constitutional system?”

Comments
B. McLeod
Jul 13, 2009 7:47 AM CST
I guess ‘Bertie’s puffing up again, now that he finally got a job. Does he want to waterboard her too?
Flag this comment
John
Jul 13, 2009 10:26 AM CST
Good old Alberto “Thumbscrew” Gonzalez. He must still think the poorly written legal memos he signed off on actually represent the law.
Just because Alberto’s Justice Department never questioned the legality of the last administration’s use of torture does not mean the Supreme Court, or Sotomayor, are caving to international opinion if they find the torture and detention policies of the last administration to be illegal.
Maybe, Alberto, you should actually learn to read the law, the constitution, and basic criminal procedure?
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jul 13, 2009 10:51 AM CST
^ Right. Maybe with Sotomayor’s help he can find the Constitution’s sections on “empathy.”
Flag this comment
T.R.
Jul 13, 2009 11:18 AM CST
“I don’t recall.”
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jul 14, 2009 12:22 PM CST
Or better yet, perhaps Gonzales can ask Sotomayor exactly WHO has standing to determine whether a president has met the constitutional requirements of taking the oath of office.
I’m thinking the requirement that he be 35 years of age and being a natural-born citizen.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Jul 14, 2009 11:57 PM CST
Even ‘Bertie’s not trying to ride that horse. None of the committee members either. Even the wingiest and nuttiests of the wingnut senators have given up on that crazy crock.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.