• Home
  • News
  • What Would You Do if Tapped as a Running Mate?

Question of the Week

What Would You Do if Tapped as a Running Mate?

Posted Aug 20, 2008 3:54 PM CST
By Sarah Randag

image

The Democratic National Convention starts Monday in Denver, and Republicans enter the spotlight after Labor Day when they convene in Minneapolis-St. Paul. But at the time of this post, both of the running mate slots are up for grabs. Many lawyers are in contention, and neither nomination is a foregone conclusion.

But we want to know what you would do if you got the nod. Would you want to run with Barack Obama or John McCain? And, if your ticket were elected, what would you fight for as veep as far as the concerns of the legal profession are concerned? Who would you push for to put on the U.S. Supreme Court, in the event of a vacancy? Who would be a good attorney general? What about rule-of-law initiatives, wiretapping, and Guantanamo Bay? But don’t let us limit you.

Answer in the comments below.

Read the answers to last week’s question about visceral reactions to victory.

Our favorite answer from last week:

Posted by Multi-jurisdictional Esq: Pump my fists, yes, but not until we—or the judge (and jury, if there is one) are out of the courtroom. Back at the office it’s loud music, Happy Hour and a conga line, too. “We Are the Champions” is among the favorites.

Comments

1.

Andy the Lawyer
Aug 22, 2008 10:07 AM CST

I’d campaign like hell for the win.  If not elected, I’d parlay alll my new heavy hitter contacts into a lucrative K-street lobbying career.  If elected, I’d return the office of the Vice-Presidency to the good old days of sipping mint juleps on Blair House’s back porch and waiting to see if the president continues to live on a day by day basis.

2.

Former Edwards Fan
Aug 22, 2008 12:20 PM CST

Oh my goodness.  That would be disturbing.  I would be very upset that anyone thought I was competent to be his running mate.  I would have to doubt his judgment, even more than I already doubt both candidates’ judgment.  I might have to leave the country:  It’s been 8 years of electoral hell but for Obama or McCain to tap me as veep would just about finish off what shreds of patriotism, and hope, I still have.

“It ain’t me, Babe.  No, no, no, it ain’t me, Babe.  It ain’t me you’re lookin’ for Babe!”

3.

L
Aug 22, 2008 3:36 PM CST

I have to agree to some extent with number 2 - I might just have to flee the country.  Who in their right mind would WANT to be put through the hell which a modern-day legal campaign entails?

4.

anon
Aug 22, 2008 3:56 PM CST

If I were asked to be the mate
I’d have to sit and contemplate
It’s hard to know which way to go
To say a firm yes, or a definite no
I’ll just stay silent…or maybe I’ll speak
But not now dear friend, call me next week.

5.

William Newbill
Aug 23, 2008 7:41 AM CST

it’s very clear that the next Vice President must help end the horrifying legacy of the Bush presidency and the Republican party notion of the rule of law.  I don’t want the job, but if it takes that sacrifice to implement my plan, then so be it.

The Bush perversion of law must be completely rejected and replaced with real adherents to the Constitution and the rule of law. Obama clearly understands the Constitution and the rule of law.  I doubt the Republican candidate understands basic legal principles. 

The next Vice President must have as his or her top priority restoring respect for our Constitution and the rule of law.  This includes all domestic law, especially Fourth Amendment law, International law including the Geneva Conventions and the Convention against Torture, and boosting the role of Congress in our system of government. 

Guantanamo must be closed and the military commissioners shut down and completely redesigned.  FISA should be amended to eliminate any ambiguity about the role of independent judicial review of warrants for wiretapping in all cases.  We will need new domestic law hat eliminates executive branch discretion in many, if not most areas of law including environmental protection. 

Most importantly Congress must be given an independent means of enforcing Contempt of Congress actions.  The new law must include the power to imprison executive branch officials who refuse to abide by the law, subject, of course, to judicial review. 

In order to regain our respect for law, Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo, David Addington and many others including our current Vice President must be indicted after investigation by our new attorney general Professor Johnathan Turley.  If the rule of law is to mean anything these individuals must stand trial for both domestic and international criminal activities.  Yes it will be very difficult but it must be done. 

Finally, we must abandon this notion that if someone committed a crime relying on an obviously absurd memo from the Office of Legal Counsel they are somehow immune from criminal prosecution.  It is difficult to fathom the sheer inanity of this position which is apparently widely held.  It’s obvious nonsense. 

Anyone and everyone, including many of our highest ranking military generals, and executive level officers must be held legally accountable, including long terms in prison for their role in torture and the many domestic crimes including the felonies committed during the Bush presidency.

Otherwise, we are no better than a Banana Republic or military dictatorship.  Guanatanamo must be closed and should be made into a museum showing what happens when the Constitution and the rule of law are abandoned wholesale for authoritarian expediency.  It can be named after our new Vice President.  Now that’s a dream we can all aspire to.

6.

Wayne Boyce
Aug 23, 2008 8:57 PM CST

That office is nothing I’d miss
There are too many backsides to kiss
Sam Rayburn was right
To Lyndon’s delight
“It’s not worth a bucket of spit.”

7.

Mike Shpiece
Aug 24, 2008 12:53 PM CST

Actually, I think it was John Nance Garner and not Sam Rayburn who said it.  But it’s hard keeping all those Texans straight.

(Until I just Googled it, I thought it was Albin Barkley.)

8.

associate
Aug 26, 2008 8:47 AM CST

I would blame it on Bush.  It’s his fault after all.

9.

NN
Aug 26, 2008 9:19 AM CST

Mr. Newbill - I couldn’t agree more. But I believe there is such a museum or at least something quite similar- it is in South Africa.

10.

John
Aug 29, 2008 9:34 AM CST

Re: comment 6.  Actually, what was said is: “It’s not worth a bucket of warm piss.”  It was later cleaned up for popular consumption.  And it was said by John Nance Garner.

11.

MM
Aug 30, 2008 5:55 AM CST

Re: Comments 1 & 5
1 You are what makes every sane american sick and dissapointed with our government.

2 Ignorant, there is no proof that Obama has any intention to uphold the constitution, in fact when he is elected and turns this country in to a (what you call) a Banana Republic or a military dictatorship and you no longer can be free to be so irresponsible with the freedom that we have that was paid for with a huge sacrifice of the lives of our men and women in the military, you are going to be ashamed to say YOU voted for this monster.
Neither one of you deserve to be nominated and if you ever were nominated to be VP or anything for that matter, many people would have to flee this country before you turn it in to mush.

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.