Real Estate & Property Law

Newly found skeleton of Richard III creates winter of discontent for 2 cities vying to claim bones


Richard III. Image from Shutterstock.

Slain more than 500 years ago on a British battlefield, King Richard III was recently determined to have been unceremoniously buried in nearby Leicester without a coffin.

Now that his bones have been identified after being excavated from beneath a parking lot, two cities are vying to claim possession of his remains, the Associated Press reports.

Although Leicester officials say all the arrangements have been made to re-inter the former monarch regally in the city’s cathedral, opponents argue that this was virtually foreign territory for Richard III, who is still a household name largely due to being portrayed as a villain by a Shakespeare play.

Better that he should be laid to rest in York, many observers say, where he was considered a local king. The York City Council is petitioning the government and Queen Elizabeth II, seeking their support for a plan that would bring the remains of Richard III there.

“Leicester was a very big stronghold of the house of Lancaster, Richard’s rivals for the throne,” said Michael Ormrod, a medieval history professor at the University of York. “He was buried almost in enemy territory in Leicester.”

Related coverage:

CNN: “Richard III: Is this the face that launched 1,000 myths?”

Guardian: “Richard III: DNA confirms twisted bones belong to king”

New York Times (reg. req.): “Bones Under Parking Lot Belonged to Richard III”

Wall Street Journal (sub. req.): “Remains Confirmed as King Richard III’s”

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy and the ABA Code of Conduct.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.