• Home
  • News
  • Manager Gave Herself $30K Raise, Stole $1.3M from Law Firm, Feds Say

Law Practice Management

Manager Gave Herself $30K Raise, Stole $1.3M from Law Firm, Feds Say

Posted Aug 14, 2009 11:20 AM CST
By Martha Neil

Unbeknownst to her California law firm, a longtime office administrator gave herself a $30,000 annual pay raise and better benefits by altering records on its computer, stealing some $1.3 million from Sacramento's Diepenbrock Harrison by this and other methods between 2003 and 2008, according to a federal prosecutor.

Regina Schenck, 46, has agreed to plead guilty to felony counts of computer fraud and filing a false tax return concerning the alleged embezzlement, reports the Central Valley Business Times.

Schenck lied to partners to get authorization for operating and client trust account checks she used to buy five horses and a horse trailer, in addition paying a federal tax lien and other personal bills, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Segal, who is prosecuting the Eastern District of California case, and an affidavit for a search warrant that is discussed in another article.

The Business Times article doesn't identify the law firm or include any comment from Schenck or her lawyer, but a 2008 article by the Sacramento Business Journal article about the alleged embezzlement does. Schenck "is a wonderful person with a wonderful family who is truly loved by her children,” her attorney, Mark Reichel, said at that time. “She has led a flawless life up to this point."

Law firm managing partner Bradley Elkin described Schenck to the business publication as "a longtime, trusted employee who had been with the firm almost since the beginning."

Schenck reportedly was terminated on Sept. 12, 2008, a day after a Capital One Financial Corp. fraud investigator called Diepenbrock and asked whether it was standard procedure for the law firm to pay employees' credit card bills.

Schenck admitted that she had unilaterally given herself a pay raise, upping her annual salary of about $100,000 to $130,000, the Business Journal recounts.

In a plea agreement filed yesterday in federal court in Sacramento, Schenck has agreed to repay $1.3 million and not to file for bankruptcy to avoid the debt, the Business Journal reports in another article.

Reichel, who is still representing Schenck, says she has cooperated with the investigation and describes his client to the business publication as a wonderful person who is now paying for serious mistakes. She lost her home to foreclosure, according to the attorney, and is now living in a rental. After working for the Diepenbrock firm from 1994 to 2008, she is now unemployed.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Aug 14, 2009 12:41 PM CST

Capital One.  What’s in your wallet?

She would have gotten away with it, too, if not for her meddling credit card company.

Flag this comment

2.

kasey
Aug 14, 2009 1:53 PM CST

I say “Kudos” to Capital One for noticing that personal bills were being paid by the firm and bringing it to the firm’s attention.  I am not a fan of credit card companies, but apparently no one at the firm was watching the store,

Flag this comment

3.

Lee
Aug 17, 2009 11:00 AM CST

Legion are the stories of partners blindly turning over control of the day-to-day operations of the firm to Ms. Schencks of the world.  I worked in two firms in which the spineless (mis)managing partners gave unfettered power to legal assistants with ZERO accountability.  When I complained to the mis-managing partners, and when the said mis-managers did nothing to correct the problems, the legal assistants become blood enemies to me.  I was forced out of those firms, which in hindsight, was an amazing blessing.

Flag this comment

4.

M.S.Harrison
Aug 17, 2009 4:05 PM CST

Schencks lawyer says she’s now paying for her “mistakes” - - -Huh? When did deliberate stealing transform into a “mistake” as in “error” dear people? Quit playing the language !  Or is it more like “we all make mistakes” so go easy on the thief ?

Flag this comment

5.

zekethewonderdog
Aug 17, 2009 9:25 PM CST

Does anyone know if the part of the plea agreement about not filing for bankruptcy runs afoul of any federal law?  My thinking would be the plea would in some manner, violate the intent of the bankruptcy laws.  I could see a bankruptcy judge finding this part of the agreement void.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.