• Home
  • News
  • Would-Be Public Interest Lawyers See Deferred Associates as Competitors

Careers

Would-Be Public Interest Lawyers See Deferred Associates as Competitors

Posted Jun 2, 2009 9:13 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Some would-be public interest lawyers are worried that deferred associates are taking positions that could have been theirs.

Some large law firms are paying new associates stipends ranging from $60,000 to $85,000 to spend a year working for public interest organizations—a pay cut for a new associate but more than the average annual starting salary of $41,000 for public interest lawyers. Among the law firms taking part in such programs are Latham & Watkins, Morrison & Foerster and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.

The National Law Journal reports that some new lawyers with a public interest focus, particularly those in the northeast, are worried about the impact on their own employment prospects.

One of them is Allison Standard, who recently graduated from the University of North Carolina law school. "The hard part is that there is no easy solution to this," she told the NLJ. "You can't blame the organizations for taking the free labor. But people who intended on public-interest careers have been working throughout law school to build a path to these jobs, and they might get passed over."

Jane Fox, who is finishing up her third year at Brooklyn Law School, is looking for work as a public defender or a public-interest lawyer, the story says. She has completed several clinical externships and worked for the Legal Aid Society in New York during the summer.

"Deferred associates are getting congratulated for going to public-interest organizations in the final hour and being so generous, while the people who were planning on working at these organizations throughout law school and have demonstrated a commitment are forgotten again by the legal establishment," Fox told the NLJ. At times, she said, she is bitter. But she also hopes the deferred associates will help public-interest groups expand services.

"We have so much to offer potential employers, but these deferral programs edge us out in one big way," she said. "We don't come with a $70,000-plus salary with benefits intact. Psychologically, it's hard to deal with that reality."

Comments

1.

CJ
Jun 2, 2009 9:44 AM CST

Look at it this way.  The biglaw dropouts are only doing this for the short term pay out.  The minute the economy gets better they’re back to the ivory tower.  Personally I think these firms would be better off donating the money to these organizations or just letting their dropouts take it string-free.  To those truly interested in a public interest law.  Keep looking and volunteering.  Most organizations see the big law dropouts for what they are and are using them as well.  The organization knows its only temporary and that there’s no real devotion there.

Flag this comment

2.

Helen Parsonage
Jun 2, 2009 11:59 AM CST

I’m dismayed to read this. Surely this is a golden opportunity for public interest groups to double up their staff with twofers? It’s not like the need isn’t there.

Flag this comment

3.

CJ
Jun 2, 2009 2:29 PM CST

I agree the need is there, but sadly, in the day of budget cuts.  It’s hard to justify taking on additional people full time even if they can fill a need. 

I’d rather see the big law dropouts take their paychecks and go get meaningful training in document review and the fundamentals of being bitched at by a partner.  That way they’ll be fully qualified as first yeaer associates when they arrive.

Flag this comment

4.

unperson
Jun 2, 2009 3:23 PM CST

Comment removed by moderator.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.