ABA Home
 
Law Practice

Court Fines Law Firm Over Partner’s Tax Levy

Posted Oct 12, 2007, 01:44 pm CST
By Martha Neil

When the IRS levied a New York personal injury firm to collect $1.2 million that partner A. Sheldon Edelman allegedly owed in unpaid taxes, Edelman—who was responsible for handling firm accounts—reportedly ignored the levies and continued paying himself and a junior partner their usual weekly draws.

Because a draw is a loan rather than income, it's not subject to IRS collection efforts, Edelman eventually argued in court. But a federal judge in Manhattan gave short shrift to that contention, ruling that a partner's draw isn't exempt from tax liens and imposing a 50 percent fine on Moskowitz, Passman & Edelman for not complying with the levies, reports New York Lawyer (reg. req.), in a reprint of a New York Law Journal article.

"Calling it a draw or advance instead of income or salary is insufficient to except it from the levies' ambit," writes U.S. District Judge Richard Owen in an opinion. The case is United States v. Moskowitz, Passman & Edelman, No. 00 Civ. 3832.



Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top