ABA Home
 
Family Law

Feds Intervene in Exec’s Divorce, Argue It’s a Ruse to Avoid $3.3B Restitution

Posted Jun 17, 2009, 04:21 pm CST
By Martha Neil

After Walter Forbes sold his Connecticut home to his wife of 27 years for $10, federal prosecutors decided they had to do something about his pending uncontested divorce.

They are now seeking to intervene in the Bridgeport Superior Court matrimonial case, contending that the imprisoned former Cendant Corp. chairman is trying to avoid paying nearly $3.3 billion in restitution after his 2007 federal conviction in a massive accounting fraud, reports the Connecticut Post.

Saying marital assets were purchased with funds that Walter Forbes fraudulently obtained, acting U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy argues in her intervention motion that "this court should not allow the Forbes family to undermine the government's work to enforce the restitution order under the guise of a simple, uncontested, family court matter."

Caren Forbes is represented by attorney William Champlin III. The newspaper couldn't reach him for comment.


Comments not appearing after a few seconds? Try emptying your cache ("Temporary Internet files"), making sure Javascript is activated, and refresh this page.


Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top