ABA Home
 
Legal Ethics

Fen-Phen Lawyer Defends Deposit of Settlement Funds Into Personal Accounts

Posted Jun 13, 2008, 07:19 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

One of three fen-phen lawyers on trial for allegedly defrauding their clients in a fen-phen case testified yesterday that he and a co-defendant deposited tens of millions of dollars of settlement funds into their own accounts for “safekeeping.”

William Gallion appeared confident and composed during testimony yesterday, the Louisville Courier-Journal reports. Gallion is charged with conspiracy to commit fraud along with lawyers Shirley Cunningham Jr. and Melbourne Mills Jr. They are accused of keeping $45 million in settlement money for themselves and putting another $20 million into a charity they controlled.

Gallion said he and Cunningham deposited funds into personal investment accounts because the settlement made the lawyers responsible for paying claims, the story says. The defendants have claimed they held back money in the settlement because they feared new suits would be filed that would have to be covered by the $200 million settlement.

Gallion also testified that a well-known plaintiffs lawyer who has not been charged in the case, Stanley Chesley, came up with the idea to put $20 million in excess funds into a charitable trust, according to the article. Chesley backed the idea as a way to “do something wonderful for the citizens of Kentucky," Gallion testified.

Gallion denied that he had ordered a paralegal who worked for Mills to destroy documents. "That never occurred," he said. Paralegal Rebecca Phipps had testified to the contrary, and said her boss believed Cunningham and Gallion had tried to cheat him out of his fair share of the fees.

Gallion described Phipps in negative terms, according to the Courier-Journal. "I hate to criticize anyone, but Rebecca Phipps believed she was a lawyer. She always wanted to step over the line and act like she had the authority and knowledge to make real decisions."


Comments not appearing after a few seconds? Try emptying your cache ("Temporary Internet files"), making sure Javascript is activated, and refresh this page.


Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top