How Yale Law School Decides Which Applicants to Admit

Legal Education

How Yale Law School Decides Which Applicants to Admit

Posted Feb 22, 2008, 02:03 pm CDT
By Martha Neil

Know someone who wants to get an edge in applying for a coveted place in Yale Law School's entering class? Being among the first—or the last—would-be legal eagles to submit an application might help just a bit.

That's because Dean of Admissions Asha Rangappa reads all law school applications in the order in which they are received, regardless of grades or test scores, reports the Yale Daily News in a lengthy article detailing the law school admissions process. It is, of course, conventional wisdom that coming in at the beginning, or the end, of a series of job interviews can help an applicant stand out in the memory of the interviewer, so that might be true, too, concerning law school applications, one might think.

At Harvard Law School, by contrast, applications are first grouped according to grades and test scores, and then read, the campus newspaper notes.

About 50 to 80 applicants are so outstanding, on first read, that Rangappa flags them as "presumptive admits" whose applications will be reviewed only by one faculty member. Concerning the rest of the 3,500 or so applications that the law school receives each year, she selects around 1,000 that are promising and sends them on to faculty readers for further consideration.

At this point, serendipity can play a role. Does the faculty reader know and admire one someone who wrote a reference for the applicant? Or does the application simply strike a positive chord with the prof? Does the applicant sound like someone he or she would enjoy teaching—or, better yet, eventually working with as a law school faculty colleague?

"Yale is the only law school that relies entirely on faculty readers, although some others do involve professors in the admissions process," the newspaper reports. As a result, there is an "element of randomness," Rangappa acknowledges, since faculty are free to use their own judgment and are not given set criteria to apply.

Because so many applicants are qualified for admission, though, "at some point it has to be arbitrary one way or another,” she says. “So why not let the faculty’s preferences play that role in shaping the composition of the class?"

Comments

Report Abuse

Posted by J.D. - 6 months, 1 week, 5 days, 23 hours, 49 minutes ago

And are there piles labeled:

“Daddy gave $250,000,”
“Mommy is a professor,” and
“Daddy graduated from here in 1985”?

And there must be piles labeled:

“Black,”
“Latino,”
“Asian,”
“White.”
Posted by js - 6 months, 1 week, 5 days, 10 hours, 4 minutes ago

The pile labeled ‘white’ is a round container that gets emptied every night.
Posted by J.D. - 6 months, 1 week, 5 days, 57 minutes ago

/\ That’s true… unless they are wealthy.

Put another way: Poor and middle class whites are the only group discriminated against.
Posted by Martin S. Snitow - 6 months, 1 week, 3 days, 5 hours, 17 minutes ago

In the Spring of 1966, I was asked to come to New Haven for an interview for my application to Yale Law. Assistant Dean Henry Poor met with me.

It was the nicest interview ever. “Well, Mr. Snitow, you’ve been accepted to Yale Law School. What would you like to know about our school?”

Dean Poor did discuss the admission criteria as they were in effect then. LSAT was most important, followed by grades. Very little else mattered.

I was just 18 when I took the LSAT, and still scored high in the 99th percentile. One of my classmates admitted to having a perfect 800 score.

Oh, how I wish the practice of law, and life in general, was just a standardized multiple choice exam!

Commenting has expired on this post.

ABA Journal - Law News Now

Legal Education