Real Estate & Property Law
Jailed Over Brown Lawn, 66-Year-Old Returns Home to Beautiful Yard
Posted Oct 13, 2008, 05:48 pm CST
By Martha Neil
As a struggling 66-year-old Florida homeowner went off to begin serving an open-ended contempt sentence for having a brown lawn last week, the president of his condominium association said Joseph Prudente brought the situation on himself.
But strangers showed more compassion for Prudente's plight—even though he had indeed ignored the association's rules and a court order requiring him to resod—after reading about the situation in the newspaper, according to articles Saturday and today in the St. Petersburg Times.
Among them, an ex-Marine and handyman who is struggling with his own issues made time to drive from his Hudson home this weekend to the Beacon Woods development in Bayonet Point where Prudente and his wife, Pat, live. With the help of other individuals and businesses who donated their time, machinery, sod and money, Andy Law soon had the yard in excellent shape, and Joseph Prudente was released after a special court hearing was held Sunday morning.
"Joseph Prudente didn't know about the work that had been done at his home, about the strangers who came together to help him," the newspaper recounts. "And when he pulled in the driveway and stepped out of his car, he cried."
In a letter to the newspaper posted on the Beacon Woods Civic Association's website, the board president says he himself went to court to testify that the situation was resolved and emphasizes that the association will work with any resident who makes an attempt to cooperate.
"The association does not send people to jail," he writes. "It is the homeowner who ignores our efforts to help people in hard economic times and leaves us no other option."
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by Anna - 1 month, 2 weeks, 6 days, 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
This is best thing I’ve read this month. Thanks for posting it.
Posted by kathy - 1 month, 2 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
What disturbs me most with this story, after reading the deed restrictions is that he actually did NOT have a violation..His lawn was covered with grass albeit brown grass, the section of the restrictions cite (2) conditions that are violations (a) more than a specific % of “Bare” areas (b) height in excess of 6” He apparently was not cited for either!