Attorney Fees
Judge Knocks Pants Suit
Posted Aug 17, 2007, 09:13 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss
A Washington, D.C., judge says a dry cleaner’s claim for attorney fees in a lawsuit over lost pants was not frivolous. Her assessment about the administrative judge’s initial $67 million claim isn’t as favorable.
Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled against Roy Pearson’s claims last month. Now she writes in an order that an award of attorney fees to the winning party in such a case would be unusual—and this case appears to fit the bill, the Washington Post reports.
"This is an unusual case, in which the plaintiff attempted to take what was at best a misunderstanding about one pair of pants and expand it to a claim of $67 million, based on legal theories that--once they clearly were articulated--were unsupported in fact or in law," the judge said.
Pearson, who later dropped his damages claim to $54 million, is appealing the verdict. The dry cleaners has withdrawn its claim for attorney fees because it has raised enough money to pay its lawyers.
Related Stories
- Judge Allows Suit Claiming a Billing ‘Free for All’ by WilmerHale
Oct 13, 2008, 01:23 pm CDT - What Weil Wants for Lehman Bros. Bankruptcy Work: $355 to $950/Hour
Oct 9, 2008, 04:52 pm CDT - Irate Judge Blasts Typos and Errors in Filing, Slashes Fees by $154K
Oct 8, 2008, 07:14 am CDT - Law Firm Sued Twice by Trump Allowed to Oppose him in Condo Case
Oct 8, 2008, 06:26 am CDT
Related Topics
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by baruch - 1 year, 1 month, 3 weeks, 6 days, 5 hours, 53 minutes ago
So, thanks to an incompetent judge Judith Bartnoff, it is now legal in DC to destroy clients property, lie about it, and even post fraudulent sign “satisfaction guaranteed”?