Criminal Justice
Jurors Discounted Star Witness, But Convicted Rezko on Other Evidence
Posted Jun 5, 2008, 12:05 pm CDT
By Martha Neil
Attorney Stuart Levine was the star witness in the federal political corruption trial of Antoin "Tony" Rezko. But jurors reportedly discounted the testimony of a man portrayed by defense lawyers as a con artist and by himself as someone who for a time lived life in the fast lane.
However, they convicted Rezko nonetheless of 16 charges related to alleged scheming with Levine to extract bribes and kickbacks from companies seeking to do business with Illinois government when other evidence supported Levine's testimony, recounts the Chicago Tribune. Rezko was acquitted on 8 other charges.
The newspaper says jurors also role-played, reading the trial transcript aloud, and organized the case visually with sticky notes during deliberations.
"We had to piece this puzzle together," says juror Susan Lopez, a school administrator.
Also apparently helping jurors reach a verdict was a lack of major dissension. "We never got to the point where people were shouting," juror Randall Franz, a mail carrier, tells the Chicago Sun-Times, although "people would voice their opinion with some emotion behind it."
Additional coverage:
Chicago Tribune: "Rezko's Guilty. Who's Next?"
Chicago Sun-Times: " The Rezko verdict: Guilty"
Related Stories
- As Clock Ticks, Defendant Seeks Evidence of Judge’s Alleged Affair
Aug 19, 2008, 05:51 pm CDT - Computer Game-Makers Threaten to Sue 25,000 in UK re Downloads
Aug 19, 2008, 05:33 pm CDT - Top N.J. Judge Can Be Personally Sued in School Bullying Case
Aug 19, 2008, 04:27 pm CDT - Judge Sides With MIT Students, Lifts Gag Order in Transit Case
Aug 19, 2008, 03:31 pm CDT
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Be the first to comment.