Juries
Mock Jurors in Fieger Case Reflected Bush Credibility Crisis, Lawyer Says
Posted Jun 27, 2008, 09:07 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Mock jurors hearing evidence in a case against Michigan lawyer Geoffrey Fieger overwhelmingly expressed a distrust of government, an attitude probably held by jurors in the real trial, says one defense lawyer.
Lawyer Steve Fishman, who represented co-defendant Ven Johnson, told the Detroit Free Press he became sure he would win the case after jurors were asked how many trusted their government to tell the truth. Johnson and Fieger were acquitted earlier this month on charges of making illegal campaign contributions.
Out of 39 mock jurors, only four raised their hands to indicate they trusted the government. "In my father's day," Fishman told the Free Press, "there would have been 38 hands up, with maybe one holdout who'd just gotten out of prison."
Fishman thinks the distrust is the result of what he believes to be the Bush administration’s deceptions on matters ranging from the war in Iraq to the firings of nine federal prosecutors.
Related Stories
- Bomb Scare at Lieff Cabraser
1 hour, 20 minutes ago - Do Good Work, and Business Will Bring Itself In, Rainmaker Says
2 hours, 12 minutes ago - Author of Fake Memoir Can Keep $32.4M Judgment, Court Rules
3 hours, 1 minute ago - Law Students Pursue Securities Cases for Small Investors
4 hours, 12 minutes ago
Related Topics
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by Kenneth G. Galica - 3 months, 2 weeks, 3 days, 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Its always Bush’s fault. How about Bill Clinton’s veracity in the Lewinsky judicial proceedings?
Posted by Former Gov't Employee and Cynic - 3 months, 2 weeks, 3 days, 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
What’s there to trust? They lie to us about the reasons to go to war. The Court lies about their motivations in judicial decisionmaking. Congress votes for FISA and telecomm immunity when the 4th Amendment Constituional violation is plain as day. There is no reason to trust government.