ABA Home
Legal Ethics

MoFo Acts Quickly After Discovering a Conflict

Posted Dec 6, 2007, 06:25 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

An expert says Morrison & Foerster took the right steps after a client’s bankruptcy objection revealed a sale of a patent to a second law firm client.

Client Novell Inc. was a creditor in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy of SCO Group Inc., the Recorder explains in its story on the conflict. When SCO sought approval of a sale of a patent held by a subsidiary, Novell filed an objection seeking more information. The buyer, it turned out, was another Morrison & Foerster client.

In a court filing, the law firm said it had established an internal "wall" blocking communication among the lawyers involved in the two matters, had notified Novell of the conflict, and had stopped its representation of the buyer until the court OKs it.

Jeffrey Neuburger, chair of the technology, media and communications department at Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner, told the Recorder the law firm responded appropriately.

"When acquiring intellectual property, if possible, you want to check to make sure that the intellectual property isn't the subject of litigation against another client," he said. "In this case, there were probably factors involved that made it a little more complicated."

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/mofo_acts_quickly_after_discovering_a_conflict/

Title: MoFo Acts Quickly After Discovering a Conflict


Comments

    Be the first to comment.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top