In-House Counsel
New Century GC Sounded Early Warning About Subprime Exposure
Posted Mar 31, 2008, 07:27 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The general counsel of New Century Financial Corp. warned of unsound lending practices in a 2004 memo that was apparently ignored, according to a bankruptcy examiner’s report.
General counsel Stergios "Terry" Theologides warned in the memo that New Century evaluated borrowers’ ability to repay loans based on initial teaser interest rates, without considering what would happen when the loans reset to a higher rate, Corporate Counsel reports. Borrowers would be hit with “sticker shock,” Theologides said, and there was no guarantee they would be able to refinance in a tight credit market.
"We should not be making loans where the inability to refinance after two years leaves the borrower at very high risk of default," Theologides wrote in the memo, which was quoted in the report by examiner Michael Missal of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis.
Theologides’ warning was ignored, even though he was a member of the senior management group and “certainly had influence within the company," Missal told Corporate Counsel. He did not elaborate.
But a lawyer close to the case who did not want to be identified told the publication that “the lawyers raised some of the right questions, but never followed through, never pushed hard."
Theologides and New Century’s outside law firm, O'Melveny & Myers, both took some criticism in the report for inadequate disclosure of risks in public filings. The report also hit O'Melveny for discovery delays. But much of the report focused on the role of accounting firm KPMG in New Century’s collapse.
Related Stories
- How to Avoid the In-House Ax—and Recover, If It Falls
Nov 19, 2008, 04:34 pm CST - Some Law Firms Sue Banks, Some Don’t
Nov 19, 2008, 11:47 am CST - Flip Side of Law Firm Merger Mania: Clients Wonder, What About Our Rates?
Nov 18, 2008, 03:14 pm CST - FDIC Breaks With Bush Administration on Foreclosure Policy
Nov 14, 2008, 05:22 pm CST
Related Topics
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Comments
Posted by David - 7 months, 3 weeks, 2 days, 7 hours, 52 minutes ago
Is the KPMG firm which this article describes as being involved with failures to disclose in the New Century collapse the same KPMG which: 1) The U.S. government pursued and accepted a guilty plea in the largest ever fraud prosecution 2) the same firm which received over $100 Million in fees in the Worldcom / MCI bankruptcy case wherein a recorded death threat against the whistle-blower to failures to disclose was suppressed by Eliot Spitzer 3) sat in tacit approval on an official committee after learning that the debtor’s counsel had simultaneously represented adverse parties without full and immediate disclosure and in contravention of law every class of creditors, the secured lender, the stockholder, and other professionals to the bankruptcy case, and over matters including fraudulent SEC filings ? Because it would be surprising to learn that the KPMG described in the current article would not have changed their name in order to avoid any erroneous attribution towards the conduct of the “other” KPMG.