Open source traffic analysis

ABA Home
U.S. Supreme Court

O’Connor Legacy Undercut by New Court

Posted Jun 10, 2008, 06:04 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Sandra Day O’Connor’s influence is already starting to wane in little more than the two years since she retired from the U.S. Supreme Court.

The court has “undercut several of her most important rulings on issues such as abortion rights, campaign finance law and government policies intended to help racial minorities,” USA Today reports. Part of the reason is due to O'Connor's emphasis on balancing tests and incremental changes in the law, which gives discretion to justices who continue to interpret her opinions.

The story outlines these areas of the law that have shifted since O’Connor left the court:

• The Supreme Court upheld a ban on so-called partial-birth abortion, retreating from an O’Connor opinion that required an exception to protect the health of the mother.

• The court made it more difficult for public schools to use race as a factor in school assignments. O’Connor had emphasized the importance of diversity and was the swing vote that allowed affirmative action in university admissions decisions.

• The court moved away from a standard O’Connor used to evaluate campaign finance cases and opened the door to issue ads financed by corporations and unions before an election.

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/oconnor_legacy_undercut_by_new_court/

Title: O’Connor Legacy Undercut by New Court


Comments

    Be the first to comment.


Commenting has expired on this post.



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top