ABA Home
 
Legal Ethics

Ohio Judge Sanctioned for Allowing Cases to Languish

Posted May 21, 2008, 06:19 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

For the first time, the Ohio Supreme Court has sanctioned a judge for “unnecessary and unjustified delay” in issuing rulings in pending cases.

The court publicly reprimanded Judge Harry Sargeant Jr. of Sandusky for allowing cases “to languish in his court for an inordinate amount of time,” its opinion (PDF) said.

The complaint against Sargeant cited delays in six cases. The court noted the cases and took judicial notice of statistical reports showing he had a significantly higher percentage of cases on his docket that exceeded time guidelines than other judges with similar caseloads, the North Country Gazette reports.

Sargeant had reached an agreement with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel consenting to discipline. He plans to retire when his judicial term ends in December, the Toledo Blade reports.

Sargeant’s lawyer told the Blade that his client’s court was understaffed. Sargeant has hired a law clerk to assist him.



Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top