Open source traffic analysis

ABA Home
Partners

Pension Suit Turns on Partner Definition

Posted Aug 17, 2007, 06:05 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A “partner” who was denied pension benefits from her former law firm because she was not considered a shareholder will get a chance to prove she is entitled to the money.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled (PDF) Wednesday that a magistrate erred in barring Karen Strom from pursuing the claim, the New York Law Journal reports.

Strom left Siegel Fenchel & Peddy of Long Island, N.Y., seven years ago to join a competing firm. Strom was denied benefits from the firm’s profit-sharing plan and cash-balance pension plans even though she had the title of "profit-sharing partner."

Leslie Corwin of Greenberg Traurig told the legal newspaper that Strom’s damages, with interest and penalties, could exceed $1 million. "The real issue here is whether she was a partner or not," he said. The decision recognizes that "law firms have to afford partners the same notice under ERISA that corporate America must give under its pension and profit-sharing plans."

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/pension_suit_turns_on_partner_definition/

Title: Pension Suit Turns on Partner Definition


Comments

    Be the first to comment.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top