ABA Home
 
Appellate Practice

S.C. Inmate Objects to Female Lawyer; State Supreme Court Clerk: Get Over It

Posted Oct 30, 2008, 02:35 pm CST
By Martha Neil

Unhappy that a female lawyer had been appointed to represent him in an appeal, a South Carolina inmate wrote to various officials seeking to have a different attorney appointed to his case.

The request resulted in a personal letter (PDF) to the inmate from the clerk of the Supreme Court of South Carolina that has been circulating among the local bar. But in it, Daniel Shearouse gave short shrift to the inmate's plea that he didn't want a female lawyer.

"You do not have the right to select what attorney will be appointed to represent you," Shearouse writes. "Nor do you have any right to object to the fact that your appointed lawyer may be a female.

"If you have a problem with females being lawyers, I would suggest that you get over your outdated and irrational views and work to establish a good working relationship with your counsel."

An employee at the supreme court confirmed to ABAJournal.com that the letter from Shearouse is genuine, but the clerk declined to comment.


Comments not appearing after a few seconds? Try emptying your cache ("Temporary Internet files"), making sure Javascript is activated, and refresh this page.


Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top