U.S. Supreme Court
Scalia Dissent Decries Court’s ‘Blue Pencil’ in Immigration Case
Posted Jun 16, 2008, 10:26 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision that an alien who requested a voluntary departure may withdraw the motion.
The decision (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog) prompted an accusation by dissenting Justice Antonin Scalia that the court had used a “blue pencil” to remedy a dilemma posed by the governing statute, even though the justices had not found a provision to be unconstitutional.
At issue was whether an alien who requests a voluntary departure must adhere to the decision and leave within the prescribed time, even though he has filed a motion to reopen the removal proceedings.
The majority opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 had created a dilemma for such petitioners. If they failed to leave within the required time, they stood to give up certain forms of relief, including adjustment of status. If they left, however, it had the effect of withdrawing their motion to reopen.
“Absent a valid regulation resolving the dilemma in a different way, we conclude the alien must be permitted an opportunity to withdraw the motion for voluntary departure, provided the request is made before the departure period expires,” Kennedy wrote.
A dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia argues the court “lacks the authority to impose its chosen remedy,” which was to “blue-pencil” the statute.
“Litigants are put to similar voluntary choices between the rock and the whirlpool all the time, without cries for a judicial rewrite of the law,” he wrote.
The case is Dada v. Mukasey.
Related Stories
- LA Airport Increases Security After Elevator Mechanic’s Smuggling Arrest
Sep 5, 2008, 11:22 am CDT - Bianca Jagger Battles Eviction, Says NYC Apt. is Her Primary Residence
Sep 4, 2008, 12:54 pm CDT - Immigration Lawyers are Hard to Find
Sep 2, 2008, 12:01 pm CDT - Hundreds Held in Another Big ICE Raid
Aug 26, 2008, 12:34 pm CDT
Related Topics
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by Michael Jones - 2 months, 2 weeks, 6 days, 6 hours, 59 minutes ago
I truely agree with Justice Kennedy and feel that he is correct on his position of voluntary departure. In our case we were basically forced to accept voluntary departure because of mistakes made by USCIS, such as the inability to get certified mail in a timely manner. The inability to be able to contact people in that agency via phone, mail or other means. They treated us as a number, not even considering that the correspondence sent to them was timely. I applaud his courage and wisdom.