Evidence
Seeing Other Side’s Docs Knocks Miami Law Firm Off of $100M Case
Posted Sep 23, 2008, 09:42 am CST
By Martha Neil
A Miami law firm can't continue to represent its client in a complex $100 million dispute because of a third party's inadvertent production of privileged documents.
Because a shareholder at the Kenny Nachwalter law firm saw the privileged material and others may have done so, too, the entire firm is disqualified from continuing to represent its client in the convoluted case, according to a 3rd District Court of Appeal in Florida ruling last week.
The underlying litigation involves state-court tort claims concerning the adverse effect that a 2001 airline merger agreement between Southern Air and Aerofloral allegedly had on a prior agreement by Atlas Air to lease two Boeing 747s to Aerofloral. There is also a related federal bankruptcy case, explains the Daily Business Review.
The Nachwalter firm's client is the Greenberg Traurig law firm, which was named as a defendant because it represented the airlines involved in the merger.
Privileged documents were inadvertently produced to the Nachwalter firm when a third-party document management company delivered them to the wrong recipient, the article explains.
A Miami-Dade circuit court judge disqualified only Lauren Ravkind, the Nachwalter shareholder to whom the privileged material was actually delivered, but both sides then appealed: The law firm contended Ravkind shouldn't have been disqualified over an opponent's error in producing privileged material, and Atlas argued that the disqualification should apply not just to Ravkind but to the entire law firm.
"This is not a case where a party fails to adequately review its own records before producing them," writes Atlas attorney Phillip Allen III of Garbett Stiphany in a petition to the appeals court. "The parties' mutually engaged document-management professional inadvertently commingled documents in its possession and then misdelivered the documents."
The appeals court apparently agreed.
Related Stories
- DA in Cheney-Gonzales Case Shouts at Judge, Who Seeks Higher-Court Backup
Nov 21, 2008, 06:01 pm CST - Lathrop & Gage to Open Calif. Office By Merging With Spillane Trial Boutique
Nov 21, 2008, 05:26 pm CST - Layoffs at Big Immigration Boutique; Fragomen Says Hiring to Be Curtailed
Nov 21, 2008, 04:43 pm CST - Kansas City, Mo., Mayor Sues After His Wife is Banned from City Hall
Nov 21, 2008, 04:24 pm CST
Related Topics
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Comments
Posted by Joe - 1 month, 3 weeks, 6 days, 13 hours, 41 minutes ago
Both firms should be disqualified, or the firm that stays on should pay the legal fees in respect to the new firm getting up to speed. You shouldnt be able to gain advanced and kick an entire firm by having an “inadvertant” disclosure that clearly puts the firm that inadvertantly disclosed to an advantage,
Posted by R - 1 month, 3 weeks, 6 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes ago
I hear John McCain is sending a copy of his debate notes to Barack Obama.
Posted by DCEsq. - 1 month, 3 weeks, 6 days, 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
OK, the issue here, please? Some kind of exposition of the legal problem would make this article more of an interesting read and well, more legal. Otherwise, we have little to distinguish this article from the latest stock quotes.