ABA Home
 
Death Penalty

Stevens Opposes ‘Pointless’ Death Penalty

Posted Apr 16, 2008, 04:36 pm CST
By Molly McDonough

For 30 years Justice John Paul Stevens has been a key vote upholding the death penalty. But now he has declared his is in opposition to capital punishment and that he thinks it's unconstitutional, the Associated Press reports.

"I have relied on my own experience in reaching the conclusion that the imposition of the death penalty represents 'the pointless and needless extinction of life with only marginal contributions to any discernible social or public purposes. A penalty with such negligible returns to the state (is) patently excessive and cruel and unusual punishment violative of the Eighth Amendment,'" he said in his concurring opinion rejecting a challenge to lethal injections in Kentucky.

Despite his stated opposition, Stevens said he will respect the court precedents in favor of capital punishment. That explains why he concurred in the result, voting against the death row inmates in Kentucky.

The AP notes that Stevens' comments "are reminiscent of the public conversion of Harry Blackmun" when months before his 1994 retirement, he opposed the death penalty in all circumstances.

"The death-penalty experiment has failed. I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death," Blackmun wrote.


Comments not appearing after a few seconds? Try emptying your cache ("Temporary Internet files"), making sure Javascript is activated, and refresh this page.


Add Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.


Most Read



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top