U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Whistle-Blower Claims Against Subcontractors
Posted Jun 9, 2008, 10:25 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a federal whistle-blower law allows suits against government subcontractors if they lied in an attempt to get the government to pay false claims.
The unanimous decision (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog) by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took a middle ground, the Associated Press reports. He wrote that a whistle-blower must show a defendant intended the false statement to be material to the government’s decision to pay.
A former unit of General Motors Corp. had contended the law covers only fraudulent claims directly submitted to the government. The whistle-blowers had contended the law covers any fraudulent claim paid by government funds.
The case is Allison Engine v. United States.
Related Stories
- ABA Prez Says FDIC Avoided ‘Catastrophic’ Results by Insuring IOLTA Accounts
Nov 25, 2008, 11:48 am CST - Muslim Charity, 5 Leaders Convicted in Hamas Terrorism Aid Case
Nov 24, 2008, 06:34 pm CST - Over 2,200 Defendants Seek Hearings in Camden, N.J., Program; Officials Stunned
Nov 24, 2008, 11:36 am CST - Kansas City, Mo., Mayor Sues After His Wife is Banned from City Hall
Nov 21, 2008, 04:24 pm CST
Related Topics
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by Andrew Paterson - 5 months, 3 weeks, 1 day, 5 hours, 58 minutes ago
Say what? “middle ground” I thought SCOTUS vacated the plaintffs’ favorable decision in the 6th Circuit and stuck a high level or burden of proof on them if they wish to suceed at trial. I suspect the Pklaintiffs don’t regard this as a middle ground decision.